I have a lot of different ideas about nature
I've read the standard sources describing the standard theories, and accepted them for a long time. But there were always obvious questions that went unanswered. These questions seemed to be frustratingly brushed off by the experts. It seemed like they didn't have the answers, weren't willing to discuss it, and weren't inclined to acknowledge that their theories were flawed. More recently I've started to see this as a problem with academics who are invested in the status quo. They aren't really progressing science anymore, haven't for decades, and if they do anything, it is to come up with a more complicated mathematical "patchwork" to cover the flaws, and then keep preaching the same stuff to everyone, like some kind of pseudo-religion. When I listen to some of them, it is almost like they are trying to convince themselves that the theory is correct, rather than convince everyone else. I think, deep down, they have the same unanswered questions that I do. More recently I saw an opening. I found a logic that seemed to incorporate everything about the standard theories, but then go much farther. I'm keeping it to myself for now. Like the existing theories, I don't know if it has any practical use, or how it might benefit anyone. I don't even know if it is correct - maybe I'm wrong! For now, I find my theory, rather than theirs, to be more intellectually stimulating. I just don't know what to do with it yet.
|
|