YOU: "Nice that you raise that...the PURPOSE of the rule is to stop folks from starting threads to complain about violations and such."
Of course, pathetically flailing fellow, I did no such thing.
What your false statement fails to acknowledge is that my posted text "... for [the] purpose of minimizing Admin annoyance inflicted by moronic miscreant negligence and unreasonableness ..." is NOT about "stopping folks from starting threads to complain about violations and such," but rather is about discouraging exclusively -- as your statement dishonestly fails to acknowledge -- I repeat, exclusively those moronic miscreants who neglect to take the action (emailing Ken) recommended to attain the best in Admin responsiveness but nonetheless unreasonably expect that level of responsiveness to be delivered and then proceed to whine here about it when such responsiveness understandably is not delivered. This leaves it wide open for any potential complaintant NOT engaging in such negligent and unreasonable conduct to take to the board and freely "complain about violations and such" at will. Hardly consonant with your sh*tty, contrary, whopper of a lie claiming that I "raised that...the PURPOSE of the rule is to stop folks from starting threads to complain about violations and such," is it, shameless Sealion?
The other "purposes" of which I posted regarding Admin's posting of the "email Ken" instruction relate even less to your bullsh*t about my supposedly having "raised" for consideration your stupid speculation (quoted at the start of this post).
YOU: "Once upon a time there even was verbiage up at the top to that effect... But I guess for some selective memory takes priority."
I don't for a moment doubt that your quasi-paraphrasing of the verbiage formerly appearing at the top of the page is well within 500,000 light-years of being an accurate reproduction of what was actually posted "once upon a time." For some, fabricated memory clearly takes priority.
Actually, when you consider someone who is so deeply disingenuous that he would stoop to embarrassingly pretending that I literally felt passing a "Must be able to count to 3" test should be required as a prerequisite for posting to this board just so he could use that absurd notion as a springboard for posting an equally ridiculous lie ... clearly, for some, fabricating anything takes priority.