R&E Political Discussion 2026

R&E Political Discussion 2026
[ R&E Political Discussion 2026 ]

CE0802 aka “The Gas Man”

Posted by Otto Kleinberg on May 22, 2026, 10:29 am

found something new to cry about. Now he is crying about Global Warming….uh, Climate Change.

CE0802 is in love with tRUMP so gas prices are ok.

Typical “Intellectually Challenged” MAGA Republican.

The report he cited provided significant facts in support of his premise.

Posted by Arwen on May 22, 2026, 12:01 pm, in reply to "CE0802 aka “The Gas Man”"

Upper end climate scenarios are fatally flawed. That understanding has now become officially recognized.

Do you disagree with the reports conclusion?

Do you have data to support an opposing conclusion?

Or is your choice to engage in personal insults a de facto admission that you are conceding his point?

I see you are still trolling for conflict

Posted by Otto Kleinberg on May 23, 2026, 2:34 am, in reply to "The report he cited provided significant facts in support of his premise."

Your reading comprehension skills are very low. Crawl back under your rock.

Asking three simple questions is trolling for conflict?

Posted by Arwen on May 23, 2026, 6:53 am, in reply to "I see you are still trolling for conflict"

Look, Scalise. Stop acting like a persecuted victim every time anyone attempts to challenge your insults with logic and reason.

Intellectual laziness will be called out for what it is here.

Get used to it.

Go easy on him, Arwen...Remember that Sock Puppet Otto is just...

Posted by Cheap Seats Shaman *= on May 23, 2026, 9:35 am, in reply to "Asking three simple questions is trolling for conflict?"

...another one of Mamala's Braindead Soy Boys with no answers.

I believe it was Eleanor Roosevelt who said….

Posted by Arwen on May 23, 2026, 9:50 am, in reply to "Go easy on him, Arwen...Remember that Sock Puppet Otto is just..."

"Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people."

Scalise loves to insult people. He considers all attempts to discuss ideas to be “trolling for conflict.”

My post wasn’t about

Posted by Otto Kleinberg on May 23, 2026, 8:50 am, in reply to "Asking three simple questions is trolling for conflict?"

the pros and cons of the article CE0802 aka “The Gas Man” posted.

Which incidently was bullshit from a Republican rag website.

My global warming go to guy is Al Gore.

Your post was yet another attempt by you to insult somebody.

Posted by Arwen on May 23, 2026, 9:46 am, in reply to "My post wasn’t about"

Hence, my questions (which you predictably continue to ignore) which brings back the focus to a discussion of the issue:

The data showing that the environmental alarmists like your “go to guy” were wrong.

As opposed to your ProgComm Rag sources?

Posted by Cheap Seats Shaman *= on May 23, 2026, 9:09 am, in reply to "My post wasn’t about"

Enlighten us with a few of them...

Oh look, another “Intellectually Challenged” MAGA Republican

Posted by Otto Kleinberg on May 23, 2026, 9:14 am, in reply to "As opposed to your ProgComm Rag sources?"

Re-read my post and find out who is my global warming expert source.

Your “expert” was wrong.

Posted by Arwen on May 23, 2026, 9:56 am, in reply to "Oh look, another “Intellectually Challenged” MAGA Republican"

In his 2006 documentary An Inconvenient Truth, Gore claimed the snow on Africa's highest mountain would be gone within a decade. It is still there.

That is just one of many examples why you should choose your experts more carefully.

Oh you cherry pick your ignorance

Posted by Otto Kleinberg on May 23, 2026, 10:45 am, in reply to "Your “expert” was wrong."

You’re proof that you can’t fix stupid.

Your childish insults don’t negate the facts.

Posted by Arwen on May 23, 2026, 11:09 am, in reply to "Oh you cherry pick your ignorance"

He predicted Manhattan and areas near the World Trade Center site would be inundated by 20 feet of sea-level rise. He cited a researcher's model suggesting the polar ice cap could be completely ice-free in summer months within by 2013.

He was wrong on both counts proving the premise of the fact-based AEI report.

I can't figure out why Otto considers him as such.

Posted by Cheap Seats Shaman *= on May 23, 2026, 10:31 am, in reply to "Your “expert” was wrong."

Otto is just another sheep following it's flock and held to their place with a few dogs.

One flawed source hardly makes his opinions salient...

Posted by Cheap Seats Shaman *= on May 23, 2026, 9:25 am, in reply to "Oh look, another “Intellectually Challenged” MAGA Republican"

After all, didn't he say that I'd be underwater by now?

Living at sea level right outside my door, I've seen no change in 40 years here. The dock still is there.

If liars like Algore are one of your primary choices, is it any wonder why no one but the mind-numbed like you take him seriously?

🥱

Ol' Otto doesn't care about facts. He's into childish insults like KR, Lucky, CHE and other dullards

Posted by Mondo Fuego™ on May 22, 2026, 5:34 pm, in reply to "The report he cited provided significant facts in support of his premise."

« Index

[ R&E Political Discussion 2026 ]