I rest my case regarding irony, anyway. Grin!

It would appear that the party loyal have come to our little club to tell us what to think and how to behave.

Let us be clear. You make three errors in your post.

First, you assume we are discussing politics when we are commenting on the results of a trial. Do you know how trials work? You see, first there is an inditement, where someone who doesn't like you files a charge against you. Then you get arraigned to answer to those charges. One side isn't your side. That's the prosecution. The other side is just as big and has the same evidence to hand, called the defence. They are on your side.

There is a judge whose job is to keep things orderly. The people who actually decide whether you win or not based on the evidence is called the jury, a bunch of your peers from a big pool selected at random, then whittled down to proper size by both the guys who aren't on your side and the guys who are on your side equally. That is a process of questioning called voir dire. So far then, the sides are equal with equal influence.

So, their guys then present evidence which your guys have already and witnesses which your guys have prior knowledge of. Your guys do the same. That's called "disclosure".

Then your guys get to question their witnesses and they get to question yours. All still equal.

After both sides are done, then they make closing arguments and that jury that everyone had an equal hand in picking goes away and makes their determination for you or against you based on the evidence and testimony by everyone; both sides equally.

In this case, the jury had to come to a unanimous decision, not simply a majority, which they did on 34 counts in less than two days. Sounds like your guy effed up pretty clearly or his team blew it. Nothing more.

The problem is every time things don't go Trump's way, it is somehow "rigged", not anything having to take any responsibility for. It's rigged. That's merely the argument of a spoilt petulant toddler when shit doesn't go his way.

BTW, that jury of your peers thing, its in the Constitution. It's only four pages. You should read it sometime. Meanwhile, since your lot has a Hard-on for Hunter, get some charges filed. We'll probably comment on the outcome of that one just as readily.

Thing Two. You assume that because we speak ill of Trump, we therefore love Biden. It ain't digital, mate. I for one don't care for either. Bashing Biden, therefore, does not drive me into your camp, anymore than Toddler Trump drives me into Biden's.

Thing Three, and typically American, the world doesn't revolve around your election or indeed you. You are assuming the internet is populated and owned by the Americans. News flash, it ain't. Not on this site and not on the Internet in general.

So, whoever you are, your politics and propaganda might play well on MTJ (which is where I assume you came from) but only reasoned discourse and civility are welcome here, not argument lacking fact or excessive American party spirit and party loyalty (something George Washington warned you lot against in his farewell address, another recommended read). We are not interested in this little corner devolving into the sewer that is MTJ.

Mike, if I'm overstepping, feel free to remove this.