It is tedious, absolutely. I thought they were worth the bother of reading, so did it anyway
Edited by Sia on June 15, 2025, 12:29 pm
You could just c&p it all without editing anything, sure. Some stuff would be a bit messed up, but so what? It's not the end of the world. I usually c&p segments to avoid stuff on the sides that I know won't post right. At first I posted all of the pix, but they were captured without context, (ie the explanations of what the lines meant), so, it seemed not worth the trouble to fix all of that stuff. Since they weren't vital, I just deleted the pix I'd copied because they made no sense without adding in separately all of the context, which would have become the most tedious job of all of it.
|
  |

Message Thread
- Two interesting pieces on Justice Barrett from the NY Times - SJW June 15, 2025, 11:04 am
- Most can't access the NYT without a subscription. So, I shared them in 2 posts.
- Sia June 15, 2025, 12:05 pm
- Thanx. Were I to C&P such items, would that work? - SJW June 15, 2025, 12:12 pm
- Yes, maybe with some discretion - Pikes Peak 14115 June 15, 2025, 3:56 pm
- It is tedious, absolutely. I thought they were worth the bother of reading, so did it anyway - Sia June 15, 2025, 12:27 pm
- #2 Justice Barrett: In Her Own Words - Sia June 15, 2025, 12:03 pm
- #1 How Amy Coney Barrett Is Confounding the Right and the Left - Sia June 15, 2025, 11:55 am
 « Back to index | View thread » |
