Everyone alive and for generations to come, yet unborn will know trump as one of the most pathetic, mentally ill liars of all time.

He is already telling people the award is really his, and that Machado simply corrected the Nobel Committee's error.

Even MAGA has to know this as a blatant, ridiculous lie.

Now that he has his Nobel, regardless how it was obtained or given, his next conquest is Greenland.

How far must he go before Congress grows a pair? Before MAGA has a corrective epiphany?

They ALL showed themselves unfit to lead or represent. He is destroying America to satisfy the itch of greed spread across his ass.

Epstein called him the worst, most despicable person he ever knew. Epstein! Epstein!

There is a new deposition and interview of Sascha Riley, Trump defenders are working extremely hard to derail and bury before it explodes.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/sascha-riley-audio-testimony-explodes-online-triggering-global-debate-over-unverified-epstein-linked-claims/ar-AA1UbMYI

So far the Riley story has corroboration from medical records, and other survivor accounts.

Introduction: A Survivor’s Testimony
This article is based on the direct testimony of William Sascha Riley, a survivor of a high-level child trafficking ring who has come forward to share his story. What follows is a distillation of the most impactful and disturbing takeaways from their account. These revelations are not merely a chronicle of one person’s suffering; they paint a harrowing picture of organized cruelty, calculated deception, and a systemic failure of institutions to protect the vulnerable. It is a story that, once heard, demands attention.

1. A Two-Tiered System: How Illicit Parties Masked Unspeakable Horrors
According to the survivor’s testimony, the trafficking events were not impulsive acts but sophisticated, multi-day affairs, often held on farms and scheduled around federal holidays. A key element of their design was a two-tiered structure that provided a powerful shield of plausible deniability for its most influential attendees.

The first tier was a larger, initial party where what the survivor calls “mildly illegal” activities would take place. This event was attended by numerous powerful people, creating a veneer of a standard, albeit decadent, gathering. As the event continued over several days, the crowd would thin out. In the final day or two, it would shrink to a “smaller inner circle,” and it was here, under the cover of the larger party, that “the really horrible shit happened,” including the torture and murder of victims.

This was not merely a party; it was a meticulously engineered ecosystem of complicity, designed to ensnare influential figures in lesser crimes to ensure their silence about the atrocities committed by the inner circle. The presence of high-profile individuals created a list of potential witnesses who could be blackmailed, ensuring that the ring’s darkest secrets remained protected by a web of compromised power.

“I think to some degree the people that that were were waiting there to the end of the party, I mean, they’re using all of those other big names and stuff that may have done things that they’re not proud of as cover.”

2. A New Hierarchy: Epstein Allegedly Worked for Trump and a Cabal of the Super-Rich
Contrary to the public narrative that has centered on Jeffrey Epstein as the singular mastermind, the survivor’s childhood perception was that Epstein was not the ultimate ringleader. He alleges that Epstein functioned more like a “lead coordinator” or a “general manager” for a more powerful group.

In this alleged hierarchy, Epstein worked for Donald Trump and a cabal of “six or eight other super rich guys.” According to the survivor, Trump was not merely a client visiting the operation; he was in a position of authority above Epstein, actively helping to facilitate the entire enterprise. This account reframes the known power dynamics, suggesting that Epstein’s network may have been a service provider for a small, insulated circle of the ultra-wealthy who were the true architects of the operation.

“It was almost as if Epstein worked for Trump... it wasn’t that Trump was a John visiting you know Epstein’s empire of of uh you know uh child victims. It was Trump was in a position above Epstein.”

3. The Calculated Cruelty: Victims With an “Expiration Date”
The survivor describes a “brothel” where a small number of underage girls were housed. These girls were sold a false narrative: that they were being groomed to be matched with a rich man who would give them a life of luxury. This lie was a tool of control, but it had a shelf life.

According to the testimony, once the girls became cognizant that they “weren’t going to really ever rise above that”—that the promise of a better life was a cruel deception—they were considered to have “passed their expiration date.” At this point, they were a liability and were eliminated. This brutal logic manifested in a staggering death toll. During a period of just a couple of months at the brothel, the survivor witnessed five people killed, including an assisted suicide, an execution by a mobster meant to terrorize the group, and other murders. The result was a 100% mortality rate for the friends he made there: Samantha was tortured to death, Sarah died by assisted suicide, and Patricia was murdered at a party.

“He said you’re good. Uh girls a dime a dozen. Boys are hard to find. Something like that.”

4. An Act of Defiance: The Attack on Trump and the Savage Retribution
At around 12 years old, the survivor was forced to watch his friend, Patricia, be tortured and murdered in their room. In her final moments, as she pleaded for it to end, he looked at her and said, “Baby, you’re going to come be with me right now.” She smiled. He told her, “I love you,” and then one of the men shot her. Immediately after her body was removed, one of the men threatened him directly: “If you don’t do everything that the next person coming in here wants, we’re going to shoot you just like we did her.”

Believing he was going to be killed regardless, the survivor resolved to fight back. His internal monologue was one of pure defiance: “I’m gonna kill this some bitch if I can just if I can just get an opportunity... I had already decided they’re probably just going to kill me anyway. I’m going to take him with me.” When Donald Trump entered the room and began his assault, demanding the survivor have sex with him, the opportunity arose. The survivor describes using a wooden tent stake to impale Trump, causing a severe injury that required him to be airlifted from the property.

The retribution for this act was swift and savage. He was taken to another party and systematically beaten by eight to ten different people. After that, he was taken to be assaulted by Andy Biggs, who beat him so badly he suffered “broken ribs and and was convulsing, turning blue.” The survivor recalls this brutal sequence as the “last of it,” after which his adoptive father said “no more”—not out of compassion, but due to the psychological toll “of watching me just get destroyed by people.”

5. A Chain of Failed Rescues: Ignored Police Reports and Institutional Inaction
Perhaps one of the most damning revelations is the chronicle of institutional failure across multiple states and jurisdictions. The survivor’s account details a pattern of missed opportunities by local police, Child Protective Services (CPS), and even the U.S. military that allowed the horror to continue for years.

Four Police Reports: The survivor recalls at least four separate incidents where his parents tried to kill him, all of which generated police reports: being locked in a Chevy van in the Texas heat, being thrown into a pool, being thrown down a flight of stairs, and being left in a riptide. After the riptide incident, he remembers the local sheriff in Alabama explicitly warning his father, “you’re going to go to jail. I don’t care... I’ll make sure of it.” Yet, the abuse continued.

A Murder Investigation: When neighbors heard screams from a duplex where a girl named Samantha was being tortured to death, they called the police. An investigation was launched, but it failed because investigators could not get permission from the survivor’s father to interrogate him as a child witness.

The Military’s Discovery: Years later, between 2008 and 2009, while the survivor was serving in the Army, his commanding officers informed him that they had discovered films of his childhood abuse on another soldier’s computer. The military prosecuted the soldier for possession but conducted no further investigation into the production of the films or the abuse itself.

This chain of events demonstrates a catastrophic, systemic failure to protect a child who was in clear and repeated danger.

Conclusion: A Story That Cannot Be Ignored
The testimony of William Sascha Riley, if proven true, implicates some of the most powerful men in the country in the most heinous crimes imaginable. His account is one not only of unimaginable personal horror but of a sophisticated criminal enterprise protected by wealth, influence, and systemic apathy. It is a story of a system that repeatedly failed to see what was right in front of it, leaving a child to fend for himself against monsters.

In the face of such testimony, what is the true meaning of justice, and what is our collective responsibility to demand it?