I received a PDF document from a relative in Canada that indicates the election was stolen by way of Starlink laser beams or some such accessing voting machines somehow. It's a very long and interesting read, and I would have to type the whole thing as I can't copy and paste it... but I'll just type this first part.
"The missing votes uncovered in Smart Elections' legal case in Rockland County, New York, are just the tip of the iceberg - an iceberg that extends across the swing states and into Texas.
On Monday, an investigator's story finally hit the news cycle: Pro V&V, one of only two federally accredited testing labs, approved sweeping last-minute updates to ES&S voting machines in the months leading up to the 2024 election - without independent testing, public disclosure, or full certification review.
These changes were labeled "de minimis" - a term meant for trivial tweaks. But they touched ballot scanners, altered reporting software, and modified audit files - yet were all rubber-stamped with no oversight.
That revelation is a shock to the public. But for those who've been digging into the bizarre election data since November, this isn't the headline - it's the final piece to the puzzle. While Pro V&V was quietly updating equipment in plain sight, a parallel operation was unfolding behind the curtain - between tech giants and Donald Trump.
And it started with a long forgotten sale.
A Power Cord Becomes a Backdoor
In March, 2021, Leonard Leo - the judicial kingmaker behind the modern conservative legal machine - sold a quiet Chicago company by the name of Tripp Lite for $1.65 billion. The buyer: Eaton Corporation, a global power infrastructure conglomerate that just happened to have a partnership with Peter Thiel's Palantir.
To most, Tripp Lite was just a hardware brand - battery backups, surge protectors, power strips. But in America's elections, Tripp Lite devices were something else entirely.
They are physically connected to ES&S central tabulators and Electionware servers, and Dominion tabulators and central servers across the country. And they aren't dumb devices. They are smart UPS units - programmable, updatable, and capable of communicating directly with the election system via USB, serial port, or Ethernet.
ES&S systems, including central tabulators and Electionware servers, rely on Tripp Lite UPS devices. ES&S's Electionware suite runs on Windows OS, which automatically trusts connected UPS hardware.
If Eaton pushed an update to those UPS units, it could have gained root-level access to the host tabulation environment - without ever modifying certified election software.
In Dominion's Democracy Suite 5.17, the drivers for these UPS units are listed as "optional" - meaning they can be updated remotely without triggering certification requirements or oversight. Optional means unregulated. Unregulated means invisible. And invisible means perfect for infiltration.
Enter the ballot scrubbing platform BallotProof. Co-created by Ethan Shaotran, a longtime employee of Elon Musk and current DOGE employee, BallotProof was pitched as a transparency solution - an app to "verify" scanned ballot images and support election integrity.
With Palantir's AI controlling the backend, and BallotProof cleaning the front, only one thing was missing: the signal to go live.
September 2024: Eaton and Musk Make It Official
Then came the final public breadcrumb: In September 2024, Eaton formally partnered with Elon Musk. The stated purpose? A vague, forward-looking collaboration focused on "grid resilience" and "next-generation communications." But buried in the partnership documents was this line: "Exploring integration with Starlink's emerging low-orbit DTC infrastructure for secure operational continuity."
The Activation: Starlink Goes Direct-to-Cell
That signal came on October 30, 2024 - just days before the election, Musk activated 265 brand new low Earth orbit (LEO) V2 Mini satellites, each equipped with Direct-to-Cell (DTC) technology capable of processing, routing, and manipulating real-time data, including voting data, through his satellite network.
DTC doesn't require routers, towers, or a traditional SIM. It connects directly from satellite to any compatible device - including embedded modems in "air-gapped" voting systems, smart UPS units, or unsecured auxiliary hardware.
From that moment on: - Commands could be sent from orbit - Patch delivery became invisible to domestic monitors - Compromised devices could be triggered remotely
This groundbreaking project that should have taken two-plus years to build, was completed in just under ten months.
Elon Musk boasts endlessly about everything he's launching, building, buying - or even just thinking about - whether it's real or not. But he pulls off one of the largest and fastest technological feats in modern day history... and says nothing? One might think that was kind of... "weird."
According to New York Times reporting, on October 5 - just before Starlink's DTC activation - Musk texted a confidant:
"I'm feeling more optimistic after tonight. Tomorrow we unleash the anomaly in the matrix."
Then, an hour later:
"This isn't something on the chessboard, so they'll be quite surprised. 'Lasers' from space."
It read like a riddle. In hindsight, it was a blueprint.
.... The Outcome
Data that makes no statistical sense. A clean sweep in all seven swing states. The fall of the Blue Wall. Eighty-eight counties flipped red - not one flipped blue. Every victory landed just under the threshold that would trigger an automatic recount. Donald Trump outperformed expectations in down-ballot races with margins never before seen - while Kamala Harris simultaneously underperformed in those exact same areas.
If one were to accept these results at face value - Donald Trump, a 34-count convicted felon, supposedly outperformed Ronald Reagan. According to the co-founder of the Election Truth Alliance:
"These anomalies didn't happen nationwide. They didn't even happen across all voting methods - this just doesn't reflect human voting behavior."
They were concentrated. Targeted. Specific to swing states and Texas - and specific to Election Day voting.
And the supposed explanation? "Her policies were unpopular."
Let's think this through logically. We're supposed to believe that in all the battleground states, Democratic voters were so disillusioned by Vice President Harris's platform that they voted blue down ballot - but flipped to Trump at the top of the ticket?
Not in early voting. Not by mail. With exception to Nevada, only on Election Day. And only after a certain threshold of ballots had been cast - where VP Harris's numbers begin to diverge from her own party, and Trump's suddenly begin to surge. As President Biden would say, "C'mon, man."
In the world of election data analysis, there's a term for that: vote-flipping algorithm.
...
And of course, Donald Trump himself: He spent a year telling his followers he didn't need their votes - at one point stating,
"... in four years, you don't have to vote again. We'll have it fixed so good, you're not gonna have to vote."
*****
Can't believe I just typed all that! Without taking a break! But there it is.
I've been following it a bit. However It will not change the outcome.
Posted by jacque on June 18, 2025, 11:16 pm, in reply to "Breaking...." Valued Poster
Thanks for some details I have not seen. Is there an online link to the pdf that you can find out? live long and prosper as best you can Jacque
I have proofed and edited my replica of it here enough times to be certain that I have reproduced it exactly like the PDF that I received. If that helps…
I almost immediately think it must be something that they are guilty of themselves.
We've already seen how Trump tried to steal the election before, calling up people asking them to "find votes" and fake delegates... all while accusing the other side of stealing the election.
So while they accuse the other side of wild conspiracies... yeah, they are probably guilty of conspiracies themselves. I wouldn't even doubt it. The bastards.
Posted by greenman on June 19, 2025, 7:33 am, in reply to "It's not paranoia...." Valued Poster
-greenman
If there's any truth in that, that is quite disturbing!
Posted by Sia on June 18, 2025, 6:41 pm, in reply to "Breaking...." ADMIN
It sounds logical and possible, but admittedly, I know exactly NOTHING about how that would work or about the election systems so can't properly evaluate if it seems reasonable.
that America WAS ready for a woman President... but it wasn't allowed to happen.
I don't know the science either, but I do know that I could see and talk to my neighbor in real time through our security camera, which would alert me of motion at our door... all the way from the US to Greece... just with my phone, security camera, and all by satellite.
It's a brave new world... where the criminals get braver, too, even IF their tracks leave traces. The bastards.
Oh yes, I know that is entirely possible. I just didn't know that it could leave NO TRACE.
I've never heard of changes made in computer systems without ANY record of the changes, least of all computer systems that do something as important as register VOTES for American elections.
Posted by Skye on June 18, 2025, 5:07 pm, in reply to "Breaking...." Valued Poster
I read through the whole thing again and had to edit a few spots where I left some things out... like that Ethan Shaotran guy, who co-created the ballot scrubbing platform BallotProof. He is a longtime employee of Elon Musk... AND, he is ALSO a current DOGE employee.
Now you HAVE to read it again!
A post note....
Posted by Skye on June 18, 2025, 4:23 pm, in reply to "Breaking...." Valued Poster
This is worth reading more than once, and carefully, especially for those of you who may have some knowledge of how computer systems and satellites work. I had to read it more than once because I typed the whole darn thing out! It sounds plausible to me, even if I don't understand all the technical ins and outs.
I understand computer systems but not how the satellites interact with them as far as programming
Posted by Sia on June 18, 2025, 7:20 pm, in reply to "A post note...." ADMIN
Our neighbors were taking care of our dogs while we were gone. That's how I would be alerted that they were coming and going by the security camera.
Technology is amazing, but it can be very difficult to keep up with, even for the professionals.
For all we know, Musk has gone in and done who knows what to our data, security systems, you name it..... while Trump fires anyone who might catch on to what they are doing.
Yeah, my youngest daughter has some computer program where she can watch & talk to her cat
Posted by Sia on June 18, 2025, 8:14 pm, in reply to "BTW..."
even while she's working in trauma surgery many miles away. When she went to Japan, she set it up at her sister's house, where Nina Beans (the cat) was staying so she could talk to her every day.
Her car, a 2024 Rav 4 hybrid with every damn gadget imaginable has a system where she gets notified where it is, how fast it's going, etc. as well as the ability to contact her car from anywhere. When J borrowed it, she forgot to lock it and K called her to remind her to lock it. Then she discovered that she can lock it herself via satellite. LOL It's crazy how far computer & satellite systems have come.
I am aware of those concerns
Posted by Pikes Peak 14115 on June 18, 2025, 5:06 pm, in reply to "A post note...."
Cyber crime depends on a lawless frontier, and everything about this electronic communication/information exchange model is that and then some.
Identity theft. Never a bigger problem, or more difficult to detect, let alone trace. By time a crime is discovered, perps are long gone and trail evaporated. With quantum computing, there is no trail at all.
This election may very well have been stolen, and Musk's onvolvement and brags are deeply concerning.
Who is the more untrustworthy? Trump or Musk? You can look away from a painting, but you can't listen away from a symphony
Trump may have been right. They may have it fixed "so good" by now that no one can uncover or pin down their tracks. Gonna need to go back to paper ballots.
on June 18, 2025, 4:02 pm
