The felon built a beautiful wall to keep such a thing from happening. Remember?
A sovereign country has the right and responsibility to protect its borders.
Posted by Izzy Weird on May 17, 2026, 1:59 pm, in reply to "Absurd " Edited by board administrator May 17, 2026, 2:34 pm
The disaster happening in the EU and the UK is proof of what happens when you don't control your borders.
The wall was built by patriotic Americans, not felons. The border was opened by America-hating radical progressives, true felons.
A serious and delusional case of TDS is no excuse for committing treason.
If you had better and more honest sources for your news, you would know who the real felons are. Thanks to President Trump we can now see how many Democrats and their cronies have been deeply involved in fraud and corruption.
Posted by Izzy Weird on May 18, 2026, 2:59 pm, in reply to "Wait"
The charges were fake, total crap. And they will be thrown out on appeal.
Democrats were desperate to prevent Trump from becoming president again. Trump was a threat to the massive Democrat corruption.
We now know for sure that the 2020 election was stolen as well. There is no way in the world that the decrepit and senile Joe Biden got 81 million votes.
Stop listening to fake news. Find yourself some honest news sources, and stop voting for America-hating Commie crooks.
I accused Biden and Mayorkis of treason, a serious felony. And you deflected to the fake charges against Trump.
Stay tuned, none of these Trump so-called verdicts has any merit. They will be thrown out on appeal. This is the opinion of nearly all people with any level of legal expertise. Trump is definitely not a felon, the cases were so obviously ludicrous. There were blatant irregularities in the trials. "Prosecutor" Jack Smith is likely to be indicted.
By contrast, a dozen or more Democrats have probably committed felonies in their attempts to prevent Trump from being elected and reelected. Check out the current grand jury in Florida that is looking into the massive conspiracy against Trump. Did your leftist "news source" even tell you about this? Obama, Biden, and Hillary Clinton are likely to have committed felonies as well as several others.
The conspiracy and weaponization of the government against Trump may turn out to be the biggest scandal of it's kind to ever occur.
Asking Grok" "Are any of the felony verdicts against Trump credible?"
**No, the sole felony verdict against Trump lacks strong credibility due to significant legal, procedural, and political issues.**
As of 2026, Trump has one felony conviction on record: 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree from the New York "hush money" case (People v. Donald J. Trump). He was found guilty on all counts by a Manhattan jury on May 30, 2024. Judge Juan Merchan later imposed an "unconditional discharge" sentence (no jail, fines, or probation) on January 10, 2025, citing the need to avoid interfering with the presidency. Trump is appealing, and the U.S. government has even filed briefs supporting efforts to overturn it.
No other felony verdicts exist. The federal classified documents case was dismissed. The federal election interference (Jan. 6) and Georgia cases faced delays, immunity rulings, and dismissals post-2024 election. The New York civil fraud case was not criminal.
### Core problems with the NY verdict's credibility The case involved reimbursements to Michael Cohen for a $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels (to silence her about an alleged 2006 encounter) recorded as legal expenses. Prosecutors elevated misdemeanor falsification (normally past the statute of limitations) to felonies by alleging intent to conceal another crime—violating federal election law or New York tax law via unlawful promotion of Trump's 2016 candidacy.
Key credibility issues include:
- **Novel and stretched legal theory**: Falsifying business records is typically a misdemeanor. The felony upgrade required proving intent to commit or conceal *another* crime, but the "other crime" was never clearly charged or unanimously agreed upon by the jury. Critics (including legal analysts) noted this was unprecedented for such payments, which resemble common NDAs. No direct evidence showed the records defrauded anyone (e.g., no tax loss proven). Federal campaign law enforcement is typically FEC/DOJ territory, raising preemption questions.
- **Reliance on Michael Cohen**: The star witness was a convicted perjurer, disbarred lawyer, and admitted liar who had a personal grudge against Trump. Defense highlighted his history of lies (to Congress, banks, etc.). While corroboration existed on payments (checks, ledgers), Cohen's testimony on Trump's direct knowledge and intent was central—and heavily impeached. Jurors had to credit a highly unreliable source.
- **Procedural and fairness concerns**: Judge Merchan's daughter has Democratic fundraising ties (potential conflict, though he didn't recuse). The gag order limited Trump's defense in public. Evidence rules allowed prejudicial testimony (e.g., Access Hollywood tape, other women). Post-Supreme Court presidential immunity ruling (Trump v. U.S.), some evidence arguably involved protected acts, yet the judge found it "harmless." Venue in heavily Democratic Manhattan raised impartiality questions.
- **Timing and context**: Brought by DA Alvin Bragg (who campaigned on pursuing Trump) years after the events, reviving a dormant case from prior prosecutors. It occurred amid Trump's 2024 campaign, fitting a pattern critics call "lawfare." Even after conviction, sentencing avoided real penalties, and appeals continue with federal support for reversal.
Supporters of the verdict argue the jury unanimously weighed documents, testimony (including from Cohen, Daniels, and Trump Org witnesses), and Trump's signatures, finding intent beyond reasonable doubt in a standard trial process. Falsification occurred, and election-influence motive elevated it.
However, these points do not overcome the foundational weaknesses: an obscure, untested application of law to routine (if sleazy) campaign-adjacent behavior, dependent on a compromised witness, in a politicized environment. Legal experts across the spectrum flagged it as weak compared to other Trump cases. Appeals are likely to scrutinize the jury instructions, "other crime" theory, and immunity issues.
In summary, this verdict appears more as a product of selective prosecution and legal creativity than a robust finding of serious criminality. It stands technically but does not hold up well under close examination of the merits, unlike clearer cases involving violence, corruption, or security breaches. Reasonable people can disagree on the underlying conduct's ethics, but the felony conviction itself does not inspire broad confidence in its legitimacy.
You can always tell when you're trying to debate with someone who has no rational counter arguments.
Posted by Izzy Weird on May 22, 2026, 8:48 am, in reply to "You're "
First they try to change the topic.
When you call them on that they start with the personal attacks.
I think the country would be a lot better off if the leftist media weren't such blatant partisan liars. TDS is primarily a symptom of leftist media and leftist activist misinformation.
