How many lives would be saved from abortions if the U.S. adopted a widows and orphans policy?
Instead of escalating the war machine dollars spent, what if we use that money for our own country?
And it gave an interesting answer:
The idea of reallocating military spending to social programs, such as a “widows and orphans” policy, is an interesting one. While it’s challenging to provide an exact number of lives that would be saved from abortions through such a policy, we can explore some related aspects.
Impact on Abortion Rates: Policies that provide comprehensive support for women and families, including financial assistance, healthcare, and childcare, can reduce the number of abortions. For example, access to affordable healthcare and family planning services has been shown to lower abortion rates.
Military vs. Social Spending: The U.S. spends significantly more on its military than on social programs. In 2021, the military budget was around $753.5 billion, while welfare programs, including Medicaid, food assistance, and housing assistance, received around $591 billion.
Redirecting even a portion of military spending to social programs could enhance support for vulnerable populations.
Potential Benefits: Increased funding for social programs could improve maternal and child health, reduce poverty, and provide better support for families. This could lead to fewer unintended pregnancies and, consequently, fewer abortions.
While it’s difficult to quantify the exact number of lives saved, the overall benefits of investing in social programs could be substantial. What are your thoughts on this approach?
It used the following sites for assembling its answer.
pewresearch.org
publichealth.jhu.edu
hms.harvard.edu
commonwealthfund.org
nbcnews.com
totalmilitaryinsight.com
thebalancemoney.com
thegunzone.com
nationalreview.com
nationalpriorities.org
Message Thread
« Back to index