So I ask WHAT EMPIRICAL observations are sufficient to refute "Carbon Dioxide Causes Climate Change"?

As simple as this question is, I have never heard of a scientific answer.

Falsifiability means a theory or hypothesis is scientifically testable and can be proven wrong through empirical evidence or observation. It's the ability of a statement to be contradicted by a possible outcome of a test or experiment.

Here's a more detailed explanation:
Empirical Tests:
Falsifiable statements involve empirical tests, meaning experiments or observations that can yield evidence.

Clear Distinction:
A test needs to have a clear distinction between success and failure. If the test fails, it proves the theory was incorrect.

Contradiction:
A falsifiable hypothesis can be logically contradicted by a set of observations.

Example:
The statement "All swans are white" is falsifiable because it can be proven wrong by observing a single black swan.

Importance in Science:
Karl Popper argued that for a hypothesis to be considered scientific, it must be falsifiable, meaning it can be subjected to rigorous testing and potentially refuted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability#