1. The cosmic distance ladder is wrong. It is based on the incorrect initial assumption that all Type 1A Supernovae have the same luminosity, and all Cepheid Variables have the same metallicity as their host galaxies. Why would they assume that all supernovae explode with the exact same luminosity?!? Leading to a phony cosmic distance ladder based on so-called "standard candles", and magical thinking... the accelerating expansion of the universe. Garbage in, garbage out.

2. That black holes evaporate over time is wrong. It is based on the incorrect assumption that Hawking Radiation occurs near the event horizon. There is no evidence of this radiation, and it leads to an information paradox, that as the black hole evaporates away, the charge & spin of matter that fell into it disappears and isn't conserved. Garbage in, garbage out. There is no Hawking Radiation. Instead, there is evidence that gravitational waves exist, and might dissipate mass, charge & spin during collisions of black holes, transferring/transforming it elsewhere. All kinds of hypothetical ideas about black holes have been made, such as infinitely-dense singularities, magical wormholes, etc. Black holes don't evaporate, they change matter into waves of "something", which exists below the detection threshold of our senses and scientific instruments. Singularities don't exist, a new state of matter in a black hole prevents it. Which leads me to the next item...

3. The missing antimatter anomaly in baryogenesis is wrong. It is based on the incorrect initial assumption that the universe started from nothing. This comes from absurdly over-reductionist thinking that the universe evolved from simpler forms, and that, going back in time, at some point about 14 billion years ago, the universe was "nothing" at all. The universe just popped into existence from "nothing". What is "nothing" anyway? If they instead made the initial assumption that there was something, then 14 billion years ago an event occurred, and it transformed into a new state or phase, which then evolved over time into what we see today, the missing anti-matter is no longer a problem. There is no missing anti-matter. All this leads to the inevitable conclusion that there is a state, or phase, of matter that we haven't discovered yet. If true, then the grand unified theory of the universe just resembles a giant evolving hyper-, or crypto-, eutectic of an as-yet undiscovered material micro-structure.

Conclusion/Recommendation:

Air was also hard for our ancestors to conceive of. They couldn't see it, smell it, touch it. And yet, the wind had real effects around them. The evidence for air was hard to ignore. Historical fact: In August 1774, Priestley isolated a new kind of "air", leading to the discovery of oxygen. It turned out that air wasn't just one "element", but many, and none were visible to the human eye. We are in the same situation as our ancestors. The galaxies are floating around in "something", gravity collapses into "something", and the universe came from "something". What substances could these be? I recommend this new direction in science begin... "right now."