I accept some of your points and don't wish to censor the contributions.
Andrew Marr's job is to ask awkward questions and not to blindly follow the government line. I accept he sometimes will make errors of fact but don't we all. As for calling Marr this is by reference to his questions if not personally. I don't want to name names or enter into a slanging match as all this is relatively trivial in the current situation where people are dying in their hundreds each day.
Lineker is always cited when obscene pay is mentioned as if he in particular and footballers in general were the only ones. I don't know many who would turn down a pay rise.
On Nicola Sturgeon it depends on the context in which 'Jimmy Krankie' is used.
The BBC is mainly portrayed as being biased by the site users. As an intelligent person I think you would agree that holding a contrary view based on considered opinion is not bias.
I always read your contributions with interest sometimes I agree other times I differ but keep them coming.
However a lot of the time the views expressed by the contributors are in a similar vein and often derogatory of eminent people who have served their country well.
Message Thread | This response ↓
« Back to index | View thread »