Posted by Liz Dance on June 19, 2022, 8:33:07, in reply to "Re: Rwanda Agreement Clause 16.1" Not good news Elsa, as that would mean if the 68 are vulnerable then that would mean that 68 people in the UK would be pushed back in the queue for medical treatment, to my mind not a good idea for this reciprocal agreement!!! Message Thread Rwanda Agreement Clause 16.1 - Liz Dance June 15, 2022, 14:57:17 Re: Rwanda Agreement Clause 16.1 - Elsa Gribbon June 16, 2022, 19:09:52 Re: Rwanda Agreement Clause 16.1 - Norman June 16, 2022, 19:20:24 Re: Rwanda Agreement Clause 16.1 - Norman Dunn June 19, 2022, 8:52:26 Re: Rwanda Agreement Clause 16.1 - Liz Dance June 16, 2022, 20:43:09 Re: Rwanda Agreement Clause 16.1 - Elsa Gribbon June 18, 2022, 23:57:04 Re: Rwanda Agreement Clause 16.1 - Liz Dance June 19, 2022, 8:33:07 « Back to index | View thread »
Post a Response WARNING! You have Javascript disabled in your browser, this form may not function correctly.Your Name: Subject: Message: Optional Image URL: Optional Link Title:Optional Link URL: Notify me by email of all message replies. Remember my name for the next time I post.By posting, you confirm that you have read and agree to the board's usage terms. Upload
WARNING! You have Javascript disabled in your browser, this form may not function correctly.
Subject:
Notify me by email of all message replies. Remember my name for the next time I post.
