AR will get very little sympathy from most people after some of the remarks she has made about other people on the supposed right of politics, I don’t think it is a good idea to appeal for the sympathy vote by bringing in the situation of her disabled son.

It is a very strange case this she is the Minister for Housing, one of her supposed friends is none other that RR, don’t you think that as RR is Chancellor she should have knowledge of how the tax system works, or maybe this sort of thing was not covered under RR’s accounts department role in her previous career!!! Also AR must have advisers within her Department to whom she could have sought advice?

It has been reported that AR has sought and received advice from 3 sources, I am sorry but I can’t believe that 3 sources managed to give her the wrong advice, in fact if you go onto the Government website which gives advice regarding Stamp Duty, Trust Funds etc there is loads of information on the subject, so did AR not even look at the Government’s own web pages. A question - when did AR seek advice from not 1 but 3 sources was this before or after she had been rumbled, I wonder?

This is not the first time AR has been investigated, she managed to worm her way out of the last investigation I wonder if she is able to worm her way out of this one, no matter what the outcome she is tarnished this being the case she should be relieved of her duties as Minister for Housing, I believe the Deputy PM role is an elected position not a selected by the PM position, what happens next?