Anybody can write anything, and they do. AI has been refined to research, write, narrate and produce public information material for profit. This is a real problem on You Tube. No humans are involved in these productions that target income through advertisement dollars, other than initiation of a production.
AI searches the web and comes up with lots and lots of mistakes. It harvests photos that may or may not be the subject, and can't discern scholarly discussion from conspiracy theory. Casual Joe who sees that material doesn't know the difference. Because it's on the web, and seems plausible, they may accept it as fact.
Here's a dandy.
In the production is this fellow
Narration would have you think the bug is unknown, is responsible for the swollen foot, and is very poisonous.
This is a tropical click beetle, in the family Elateridae and is not venomous at all, nor a threat to people.
Much more of the narrative is full of mistakes.
I saw this and had a good laugh
This is a North American orchid. Cypripedium acaule. It does not eat insects. No orchid does. Throughout the AI presentation, more photos of orchids are shown with implication the pouches trap and eat insects. They force the insect, a wasp to escape by the only way out, where sticky pollenia attach to its head. In the next orchid flower the wasp butts into the column on its way out of the lip, dropping off its pollenia, picking up a new batch. The lip petal uses the wasp for reproduction, not food.
This kind of stuff is absolutely exploding on the web because of how it makes money for producers who do very little work, and have no interest in anything other than as much viewership as possible.
The science journals like Cell aren't interested in the big insects which have been known for well over a century, and are thoroughly documented. The big specimens showing up in the trade is not a topic of research interest ... yet.