Religion and Ethics BBS

Religion and Ethics BBS
[ Religion and Ethics BBS ]

Lefties Losing It: ‘Trans activists’ meltdowns after UK Supreme Court definition of a woman

Posted by DFM on April 25, 2025, 12:00 pm

Michael looks like a Mickey Mouse caricature. LOLS:-))))))

Posted by GOG on April 26, 2025, 7:10 am, in reply to "Lefties Losing It: ‘Trans activists’ meltdowns after UK Supreme Court definition of a woman"

Love Rita!!

I've been following this matter in the UK for a long time.

Posted by 7:77 on April 26, 2025, 6:59 am, in reply to "Lefties Losing It: ‘Trans activists’ meltdowns after UK Supreme Court definition of a woman"

The "trans wars" have been a LOT more intense in the UK than in the US (and it's a total non-issue over here in Japan). I guess I noticed it early on because I've always enjoyed the Harry Potter books, and JK Rowling has been such a central public figure in the controversy. Plus I'm a big fan of (and former participant in) women's sports.

This US Supreme Court ruling (which is a clarification, not a change in the law) is a massive game-changer. In specifying that older legislation, when using the term "women," was referring to biological females (since the notion of socially-based gender as something separate from biological sex was either unheard-of or an obscure academic discussion, depending on how old the legislation was), this ruling opens the way for designating female only spaces, female-only sporting competition, and other situations in which differentiation is clearly based on biological differences between males and females. That is, situations in which not differentiating that way is unfair or even dangerous to females...

Transgender people lose no actual human rights because of this decision. They still can't be discriminated against on that bases in the workplace, in housing, in access to services, and so forth. If some male wants to think of themselves as a woman and dress accordingly or even seek medical treatments to make their body more feminine in superficial* appearance, I have no problem with that. Same for trans females who want to present as men (and who I'd like to point out are seldom so insistent on playing "look at me" in public...most just seem to want to be left alone). Thus ruling just allows governments and organizing bodies to differentiate according to biology, and that's as it should be.

*It will still be a male body, of course, regardless of how much "wetwork" they've had: biological sex remains immutable at the cellular level.

"UK Supreme Court," of course.

Posted by 7:77 on April 28, 2025, 3:40 pm, in reply to "I've been following this matter in the UK for a long time."

Curse you, lack of edit functionality!

You said it: "biological sex remains immutable at the cellular level."

Posted by DFM on April 26, 2025, 6:36 pm, in reply to "I've been following this matter in the UK for a long time."

I like when Tranny advocates are asked what a woman is, and there answer...

Posted by CE0802 on April 26, 2025, 6:12 am, in reply to "Lefties Losing It: ‘Trans activists’ meltdowns after UK Supreme Court definition of a woman"

...is "Someone who identifies as a woman".

Basically, answering "What is a car" with "A car is a car."

Or they'll bring up people with chromosomal abnormalities, as if every tranny freak has chromosomal abnormalities.

No. They're just freaks with a mental illness.

"with a mental illness" Bingo.

Posted by DFM on April 27, 2025, 5:19 pm, in reply to "I like when Tranny advocates are asked what a woman is, and there answer..."

Why is it that if someone thinks he's Elvis, everyone knows he has a mental illness, and...

Posted by CE0802 on April 28, 2025, 9:59 am, in reply to ""with a mental illness" Bingo."

...if someone thinks he's Henry the 8th, everyone knows he has a mental illness.

But if a man, who looks down at himself and sees a penis and testicles, thinks he's a woman, that's NOT a mental illness, and we're all supposed to play along?

It's a mental illness. These people are unwell.

They need professional help, not a dress and makeup.

Some people like to dress like Elvis. They are not mentally ill.

Posted by Ken C on April 28, 2025, 11:04 am, in reply to "Why is it that if someone thinks he's Elvis, everyone knows he has a mental illness, and..."

What if people know they are Men, but want to dress like Women?

"Mental illness" seems derogatory and has too much social stigma attached to it.

Trans people are mostly harmless. My only complaint is when they want to compete with real women.

They are if they really think they are Elvis.

Posted by CE0802 on April 29, 2025, 3:08 pm, in reply to "Some people like to dress like Elvis. They are not mentally ill. "

If you ask a Tranny "Are you a woman?", and they say "No, I just like wearing women's clothing out in public", then they have something of a mental illness, but what they REALLY have is a sexual fetish where they get their rocks off wearing women's clothing in public.

And no, they shouldn't be walking around in public dressed as women.

If you ask a Tranny "Are you a woman?", and they "YES!" then they definitely have a mental illness, and they shouldn't be walking around in public dressed as women, but instead need professional help.

Enough already with the insanity of a 6' 6" man with a huge Adam's apple and hairy legs and beard stubble walking through the pedestrian mall on a Saturday afternoon wearing a wig and a dress.

DFM are you GaY? You sure follow them closely

Posted by Lucky on April 25, 2025, 6:41 pm, in reply to "Lefties Losing It: ‘Trans activists’ meltdowns after UK Supreme Court definition of a woman"

Maybe you should clean your own closet out before you look in someone else’s

NO.

Posted by DFM on May 2, 2025, 11:17 am, in reply to " DFM are you GaY? You sure follow them closely "

« Back to index

[ Religion and Ethics BBS ]