Religion and Ethics BBS

Religion and Ethics BBS
[ Religion and Ethics BBS ]

Brigitte Gabriel Just EXPOSED 1,400 Years of TRUTH (Nobody Was Ready)

Posted by DFM on May 12, 2025, 9:42 pm

Very effective speaker. Putting her comment about 9/11 aside,

Posted by GOG on May 14, 2025, 5:17 am, in reply to "Brigitte Gabriel Just EXPOSED 1,400 Years of TRUTH (Nobody Was Ready)"

I found her rant to be very interesting. I love history. She is certainly a galvanizing orator. Frankly, I’m not to keen on there being 7,000,000 Muslims living here is America. Another Semite fifths column . Given a choice I would prefer leadership and rule by Jews. The gentile world has lost its claim to that. Sad. I find the last part of Revelation to be the most interesting. A shattered world administered and ministered to by the 144,000. Jerusalem shall be the capital of Planet Earth. The birth pangs are in countdown.

HARDLY an objective source

Posted by Trish on May 13, 2025, 4:26 am, in reply to "Brigitte Gabriel Just EXPOSED 1,400 Years of TRUTH (Nobody Was Ready)"

Gabriel's organization ACT for America has been described as anti-Muslim. ACT for America draws "on three rather religious and partisan streams in American politics: evangelical Christian conservatives, hard-line defenders of Israel (both Jews and Christians) and Tea Party Republicans

She's turned being anti-Muslim into a profitable operation.

Posted by Mugwump on May 14, 2025, 8:17 am, in reply to "HARDLY an objective source"

Name one objective source.

Posted by GOG on May 14, 2025, 6:25 am, in reply to "HARDLY an objective source"

What else can be expected from an OCD sufferer?

Posted by Mugwump on May 13, 2025, 1:39 pm, in reply to "HARDLY an objective source"

Ad feminam criticism; ignores the CONTENT.

Posted by DFM on May 13, 2025, 4:43 am, in reply to "HARDLY an objective source"

The character of my gender has nothing to do with your poor source

Posted by Trish on May 14, 2025, 5:25 am, in reply to "Ad feminam criticism; ignores the CONTENT."

Nothing to do with gender; your comment is a diatribe against the AUTHOR.

Posted by DFM on May 14, 2025, 5:27 pm, in reply to "The character of my gender has nothing to do with your poor source"

"Ad feminam" is a Latin phrase that translates to "to the woman" or "against the woman [in this case, Bridgette Gabriel]." It's used in the context of argumentum ad feminam, a rhetorical fallacy

It wouldn't matter if it was a man - still piss poor choice

Posted by Trish on May 15, 2025, 3:58 am, in reply to "Nothing to do with gender; your comment is a diatribe against the AUTHOR."

for "documentation" or "resource"

PS I was quite aware of the meaning of the phrase, David. Please don't insult my intelligence

She was THROUGH a fanatically ruled state. She is speaking from experience.

Posted by DFM on May 15, 2025, 4:16 pm, in reply to "It wouldn't matter if it was a man - still piss poor choice"

« Back to index

[ Religion and Ethics BBS ]