but none of you died and the alternative is to take your chances with no vaccine?* Archived Message
Posted by shua on June 7, 2022, 12:21:13, in reply to "Fair, but I’d also like a vaccine to work better than 47% *"
 Previous Message  Previous Message Or do you believe the odds are still 47%?  Previous Message And I’m saying based only on that, I can’t know if the vaccine did much. I mean come on, it didn’t keep ANYONE from getting it. 0 for 6. That’s not at least an eyebrow raise for you?  Previous Message work
|
Message Thread: | This response ↓
- Why would you refuse the COVID vaccine, but when you test positive call in to get Paxlovid? - ibdoc June 7, 2022, 10:35:07
- because these people are dumb and, what's changed about society is that other people are.... - suburbanmyth June 7, 2022, 11:12:50
- MAGA* - Stu June 7, 2022, 10:56:54
- Different profession but… - SurfTheBoneyard June 7, 2022, 10:44:07
- I think the response would be that the vaccine benefit doesn’t seem to outweigh the cost - meanjeans June 7, 2022, 10:36:35
- What cost is that? The $0 out of your pocket, or the avoidance of more serious illness? - uofi1998 June 7, 2022, 10:58:37
- Like… the social cost? Of having to tell your other nut friends you got vaxxed?* - Carl Spackler June 7, 2022, 10:48:59
- You’re confusing 100% efficacy with no efficacy - snipes824 June 7, 2022, 10:42:50
- ooo - Kajagoogoo June 7, 2022, 10:42:30
- This makes zero sense* - John Coctostan June 7, 2022, 10:41:36
- What is the cost of getting a vaccine?* - Sounder June 7, 2022, 10:39:05
|
|