Re the Duchess of Windsor's two pearl necklaces.
I found a number of inconsistencies in the article. At the very least the captions to some of the photos need to be adjusted.
For example -- according to all that I have read this is the Cartier necklace said to have belonged originally to Queen Mary.
When the necklace was last auctioned in 2007 Sotheby's classified it as the necklace belonging to Queen Mary. See Sotheby's http://www.sothebys.com/en/auctions/ecatalogue/2007/magnificent-jewels-n08371/lot.364.html
In the first of the photos showing this necklace the author says that it is the Cartier one. In the second (also showing the earrings) it is said to be the Van Cleef and Arpels necklace!
It seems to me, based on the evidence available to me, that the Van Cleef and Arpels necklace is the lower (or outer) necklace in the photo below.
I found I was not convinced by the very interesting thesis that Queen Mary gave the necklace to the Duchess circa 1952.
The author argues that the first time the Duchess of Windsor was photographed wearing the Cartier Queen Mary necklace was on 2 May 1952 in a series of photos by Dorothy Wilding.
According to the National Portrait Gallery UK this photo was taken by Wilding on 2 May 1952.
https://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/portrait/mw168417/Wallis-Duchess-of-Windsor-Prince-Edward-Duke-of-Windsor-King-Edward-VIII?LinkID=mp05920&search=sas&sText=Duchess+of+Windsor&wPage=5&role=sit&rNo=104
While the Cartier pearl pendant is worn on the lower of the two necklaces, neither necklace matches the Cartier Queen Mary necklace.
The central pearl in the lower necklace photographed in 1952 is an oval or egg shaped pearl, not a spherical pearl. Nor is that pearl (1952) significantly larger than the adjacent pearls, as is the case in the Cartier necklace.
I strongly suspect that the Duchess of Windsor had been wearing the necklace seen in Wilding's 2 May 1952 photo for some time.
In particular in this 1950 photo
I suspect that the Duchess had a series of necklaces of a similar style, but until she commenced wearing the Cartier necklace, none seemed to have significantly large pearls.
I know that it is commonly accepted that the Cartier necklace came from Queen Mary. If it did, I am not convinced that it matches the one portrayed in Jagger's 1930 painting of Queen Mary. Those pearls are not graduated.
I wonder where the information came from that King George gave Queen Mary the Cartier necklace in 1926? I would love to know.
At the end of the article the author says that Calvin Klein purchased the Van Cleef and Arpels necklace with the Cartier pendant; yet, when Kelly Klein sold the items Sotheby's said the necklace was the Cartier one. See http://www.sothebys.com/en/auctions/ecatalogue/2007/magnificent-jewels-n08371/lot.364.html
Apart from my little quibbles, I found the article very interesting --as are the other items in the blog.
1
Responses « Back to index | View thread »