Evidence for sphere isn't proof. The sphere is nothing but a hypothesis. Nobody has established the real configuration of the earth and cosmos beyond reasonable doubt because there are too many anomalies associated with a sphere, and even the flat hypothesis has problems. Either way, a "belief" in either configuration is tantamount to a religious faith.

It certainly is interesting how the sphere SEEMS to be consistent with certain things. But so is the flat hypothesis. The first problem that YOU have as well as other cryonicists, is that you simply refuse to entertain certain anomalies that are INconsistent with the sphere. You won't even look there. You refuse. You're not interested. You think the sphere is fact. Until and unless you're at least open to considering and entertaining alt theories, keystrokes I make here are a complete waste of time, other than for my own satisfaction of seeing my own response in my very unpopular forum with no visitors.

Too bad for you. You missed the hottest part of the online debate about flat earth a few years ago. Your lack of curiosity is probably the worst part of the deal for you. Lack of curiousity about things in general consistutes a dead mind, a mind with no life, no spirit, no zest. How can you fix that? I would recommend starting with a little bottle of 5 Hour Energy, the type sold on countertops in convenience stores and in cases of 12 at grocery stores in the supplement aisle.

Starman indeed. What a laugh. You likely haven't even looked at stars yourself Jones. You're not a Starman. You're a fraud. Someone who calls themselves starman should at least be able to prove what stars are. They're not what YOU think they are. Your belief that stars a billions of lights away is unproven and simply an hypothesis. Wake up and smell the hoax... learn skepticism and critical thinking.

YOu and Pizer are way beyond annoying. Both of you are simply to be dismissed as what I might call flatheads because you're flat-minded.

Happy Hollow-headed Hollow-Ween, Flathead Jones.