so you're saying this is evidence of a conspiracy?

permalinkdeletereportblock subredditmark unreadreply

[–]to /r/longevity sent 6 minutes ago

Your ridiculous notion of "evidence based" rather than "rumor based" defies normal understanding of what is and what is not discussible on a forum. Rumors, hearsay and gossip, from a sociological perspective, if you ever cared to widen your educational background by reading something other than hard-sciences, are useful. I would say that you simply don't want the word adronochrome in your forum because it's associated with such horrifying and terrible atrocities, as far as the rumors go. You're not banning my discussion of it "because it's not evidence based"... but rather because you want to sanitize your forum and keep it free of such ugly controversial associations. And even THAT point is a point you wish to avoid because the criminal and inhumane aspects of adrenochrome. Nonetheless, the claims being made for it are pretty interesting and if even a fraction of the results of the extract being produced illegally and inhumanely can be replicated with a synthetic version, then anti-agers with the means and secretive ability, will likely be interested. You're use of the word conspiracy is tiresome and you ought to widen your vocabulary.

permalinkreply