https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FZgU7wtgMYY
My comment
The negative comments I've read through so far, about 20 of them, below, miss the upside of this. We're witnessing a "personal ChatGPT "with graphics" and "voice simulator"" which is merely an advanced form of "a book" written by the person. Daryl could have written a book under his real name, and the same problems apply to that book in terms of someone else using his name to publish another book using the same name and saying something different. A book, say an autobiography, can also have an "index" so that a read could "cheat", say, and look up "residences over my lifetime". I'm sure that when "printing books en masse" began with Caxton's Press in 1460AD, similar comments were made as we read below. The AI personal clone is nothing other than a "fancy" autobiography. I think it's rather cute, actually but the AI clone face should be a bit more realistic. This is the first interview on mainstream media I've seen doing this kind of thing but I think it'll definitely take off nicely. The biggest problem I see is cooling the AI servers which requires a lot of water or cold climates. Apparently China has a new chip that's better than Nvidia that runs more efficiently (cooler) so maybe that can be solved too. I would encourage commenters here to reconsider and look at the advantages before looking at the downsides. Every technology can be abused, as we see around us, but abuse is not an excuse for disuse.
36
Responses