Mar 13, 9:35 AM EDT
/ by
Noor Al-Sibai
Scientist Who Gene-Hacked Human Babies Says Ethics Are "Holding Back" Scientific Progress
"Ethics is holding back scientific innovation and progress."
Getty / Futurism
Image by Getty / Futurism
It's been nearly three years since controversial Chinese biophysicist He Jiankui was released from prison for gene-hacking human babies and now, he appears to be hitting back at the rules that led to his punishment.
In a cryptic post on X that featured a photo of the scientist blankly staring directly into the camera, He wrote that "ethics is holding back scientific innovation and progress."
Though he doesn't mention it directly, that post seems like a clear reference to the ethical standards that made his 2018 gene-hacking experiments which saw him using CRISPR to edit the DNA of twin girls pseudonymously known as "Lulu" and "Nana" in an attempt to make them immune to HIV the source of global public outcry.
After He announced that he'd created the world's first so-called "CRISPR babies" and that they'd been born seemingly without defect, the experiments were widely denounced as unethical to the point of abomination. In 2019, the scientist was arrested in China and sentenced to three years in prison and just 18 months after his release in April 2022, He was back in the lab working on how to use genetic editing to fight Alzheimer's.
Despite his return to the lab, however, it appears per a string of English-language missives posted on X that the notorious Chinese scientist has a chip on his shoulder about the stigma he accrued for his gene-hacking experiments.
"Gene editing technology has the power to reshape the world," He wrote in a November post, "like [the] nuclear bomb."
"Great revolution begins with controversy," the scientist declared in another.
Alongside his vague proclamations of grandeur, He also came down hard on the use of biological weapons, paid lip service to the potential for universal access to genetic editing regardless of income, and even claimed in one post from December that "gene editing should not be conducted in countries with lax regulation in ethics."
Taken together, these statements paint the portrait of a self-righteous scientist who, like so many of his Western counterparts, seems to believe despite all evidence to the contrary that he has been "canceled" for going against the grain.
The reality, of course, is that He clearly feels hemmed in by the ethical rules that he was punished for ignoring the first time around and wants to be able to do his problematic work in peace.
More on strange science: Weird New Computer Runs AI on Captive Human Brain Cells
Share This Article
Read This Next
2.02.25 Genetics
A Mouse With Two Dads Has Reached Adulthood
6.06.24 Breakthroughs
Scientists May Have Just Discovered the Cause of Crohn's Disease
4.23.24 Genetics
Startup Uses AI to Edit Human DNA
4.03.24 Treatments
Gene Editing Experiment Halted as Patient Gets Weird Side Effects
3.20.24 Genetics
Scientists Manage to Cut HIV Out of Individual Cells
The Latest
3.13.25
RFK Jr. Suggests That Everyone Just Catch Measles
"The measles gave you lifetime protection against measles infection."
By Noor Al-Sibai / Read More >>
3.13.25 Cancer
US Deports 10-Year-Old Girl Who Was Partway Through Brain Cancer Treatment
"The authorities have my children's lives in their hands."
By Frank Landymore / Read More >>
3.11.25
Man Whose Daughter Died From Measles Stands by Failure to Vaccinate Her: "The Vaccination Has Stuff We Dont Trust"
"Everybody has to die."
By Noor Al-Sibai / Read More >>
Keep up.
Subscribe to our daily newsletter to keep in touch with the subjects shaping our future.
I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its User Agreement and Privacy Policy
+Social
+Newsletter
Topics
About Us
Editorial Standards
Contact Us
DISCLAIMER(S)
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
DMCA Policy
Articles may contain affiliate links which enable us to share in the revenue of any purchases made.
Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service.
© Recurrent Ventures Inc, All Rights Reserved.
18
Responses