The creation of manna is clearly associated with the ark of the covenent in the bible but it's unclear what manna was. Von Daniken proposes algea of some kind. What I cannot get from von daniken is how the morning dew is a part of the process. Von Daniken proposes that the machine, the ark, is crcreating the manna or algea but he doesn't really associatei it with morning dew. It's interseting to me to note that morning dew is moisture and that moisture is required for algae to grow. Is it concievable that the machine would produce spores of algea that could be ejected onto the ground where the morning dew, water, could reproduced that algea? Is algea a spore like fungus or is algea something else? It seems to me that Von Daniken is onto something here but did not draw the conjnection between morning dew moisture with dispersal of algea seeds or however algea reproduce. How do algea reproduce and thusly provide food for noah's people crossing the so called desert.. which could not have been real desert since the desert doesn't produce morning dew? Right there is a contradiction.




You've raised some interesting points connecting Von Daniken's theories about the Ark of the Covenant and the creation of manna with the biological requirements for algae growth. Let's break down the ideas and address your questions:

**Von Daniken's Theory and the Ark:**



* Von Daniken, known for his "ancient astronaut" theories, often proposes that religious artifacts were advanced technology misinterpreted by ancient people. In the context of manna, he suggests the Ark of the Covenant could have been a machine that produced algae.



**Manna and the Bible:**



* The biblical description of manna is ambiguous. It's described as a "fine, flake-like thing" on the ground, resembling frost. It tasted like wafers made with honey. It appeared with the morning dew. A key aspect is that it appeared miraculously and regularly during the Israelites' wanderings in the wilderness.



**Algae and Reproduction:**



* **Algae are diverse.** They are not fungi. They are photosynthetic organisms, meaning they produce their own food using sunlight, water, and carbon dioxide.


* **Algae reproduce in various ways,** both sexually and asexually.


* **Asexual Reproduction:** This can involve simple cell division (splitting into two), fragmentation (breaking into pieces that grow into new individuals), or the production of spores. Spores are single-celled reproductive units that can be dispersed and develop into new algae.


* **Sexual Reproduction:** This involves the fusion of gametes (sex cells) to form a zygote.



**Connecting Algae, Manna, the Ark, and Morning Dew:**



Your thought process is interesting:



1. **The Ark as a Spore Dispersal System:** It's conceivable that *if* the Ark was a machine, it could have been designed to release algae spores.


2. **Morning Dew as a Trigger:** The morning dew is key. Algae need moisture to germinate (if they are in spore form) and grow. The daily presence of dew would provide the necessary water for the spores to develop into a visible and harvestable algae bloom.


3. **Von Daniken's Gap:** You're right that Von Daniken's theory often lacks detailed explanations of how the technology would work. He often presents the idea without fully fleshing out the mechanisms.



**Challenges to the Algae Hypothesis:**



* **Nutrient Requirements:** Algae need more than just water and sunlight. They also require nutrients like nitrogen, phosphorus, and other minerals. Even if the dew provided moisture, the ground would need to have these nutrients available. A barren desert environment would likely lack these essential elements. [This is consistent with Greater Earth crossing from Saturn crater by Wim Carette on rumble]


* **Desert Dew and Humidity:** The amount of dew in a true desert is usually minimal. Dew formation requires a drop in temperature overnight, causing condensation. In extremely arid environments, the air may be too dry for significant dew formation.


* **Taste:** The biblical description of manna as tasting like honey wafers doesn't necessarily align with the taste of most algae. Some algae are edible, but they often have a more "earthy" or "seaweed-like" flavor. However, some algae might be palatable and nutritious.


* **Regularity and Reliability:** A machine that produces manna would need a reliable energy source and a constant supply of algae "seed" cultures. This raises questions about how this system would have been maintained in the desert. [Rick says- it had antenna on it that could produce current from atmospheric electricity]



**Reconciling "Desert" with Dew:**



You're right to question the "desert" aspect. The biblical descriptions of the Israelites' wanderings may not accurately depict a true, hyper-arid desert. It's possible that the areas they traversed were more semi-arid or steppe-like environments that could support some dew formation and vegetation. Some scholars suggest the term "wilderness" in the Bible may be a more accurate description than "desert." It also might mean that there was dew only in some areas.



**Conclusion:**



Your ideas are worth considering. Algae could theoretically be a source of food in such a scenario, especially if combined with a mechanism like the Ark to disperse spores and morning dew to provide moisture. However, the algae hypothesis faces challenges related to nutrient availability, the amount of dew in a true desert environment, the taste of algae compared to the biblical description of manna, and the need for a reliable and sustainable system. It's important to note that Von Daniken's theories are speculative and lack scientific evidence. However, exploring these possibilities helps to critically analyze both religious texts and scientific explanations.