AGAIN, idiot, get this through your molten-lead head:
"There was no need for Vanna White or anyone else to 'physically' turn the letters in 1975. No more than there was a need to 'physically' turn the numbers in 1958."
THAT was the ENTIRE text of my original post and, as even YOU acknowledged, it is absolutely correct. Notwithstanding the insane figments of your run-amok imagination, I ARGUED NOTHING ELSE. So WTF are you arguing about?
Your closing babble: "But to idiots like you and Hemi, it can't have anything to do with that..."
WTF are you referring to as "it"? Moron, are you at all familiar with the term antecedent? HAVE YOU EVER IN YOUR LIFE ACTUALLY USED ONE for the sake of clear communication?
If you could possibly communicate less like a dumb aquatic animal and more like an intelligent human being I might actually stand a fighting chance of gleaning, in whole or at least in part, whatever the hell it is you are BARKing about in claiming that I believe "it can't have anything to do with that."
You didn't have the squid sandwich, did you, Sealion? Shame on you.