But most mainstream sources' real problem isn't that their reports are "fake." It's that they're puddle-shallow. Crafted for the short attention span crowd. Incomplete pictures when depth of information (and broader context) is important. It's frustrating, if solvable - when the matter is of sufficient import and/or interest to warrant real research. Otherwise it doesn't matter...which makes it antimatter, right? (swidt?)

I'm not sure why we're here, either. I had high(ish) hopes, I guess, as I'm sure did KenC. I don't think it'll be around all that much longer.