on Meidas Touch. Ben Meiselas is usually incredibly slow and boring to bring out a story. It may take him two minutes to say something he could have said in twenty seconds, and his monotone drone almost insufferable.

But he covered the protest in LA and Tel Aviv and alluded to social media carrying what the network news does not or will not, in what appears to be a shift in network news.

The fact so much network news was bought by mega billionaires and are not reporting these protest stories indicates owner intent to influence, undoing the time tested traditional job of these organizations to report the facts, and let readers or watchers make our own decisions.

Essentially they are becoming what the felon accused them of for years; producers of fake news, which also appears less caustic and problematic for the felon.

For what purpose? To curry his favor? For quid pro quo? To fly under the radar, out of sight, and off his hit list target?

The line of truth under this policy and intent has become razor thin and largely firstly or only available on social media, from direct recording by observers who happen to be there at the right place and time to capture imagery and allow it to speak for itself.

It's like a fog of war moving in, where even the ground upon which we stand is uncertain. You can alamost feel the fog of war moving in.

I believe Chris Hayes may have mentioned the big protest. I went to the local protest, and it was as big as the No Kings Day event. There was no news coveragv of it at all. Didn't even get mentioned. Our media leans conservative. Their parent companies do too. The protests are seen more as a liberal agenda, and less as a national agenda, when in fact they are greatly national. People from all walks appear at these protests, and the common theme is lawlessness of the felon in the White House.