https://jamesgmartin.center/2026/03/higher-eds-new-human-subjects-problem/

This type of "research" has also wormed its way into the natural sciences as well as other disciplines as well. The social sciences are just the low hanging fruit so to speak.

You can no longer trust the science or scientists when their methods are polluted.

Excerpted from the article:

Falsifiability and Research Ethics

Karl Popper articulated that, for work to be considered science, it must be falsifiable. By this, Popper meant that a theory is scientific if, in principle, it can be shown to be false by evidence. Work that does not meet this fundamental criterion is merely pseudoscience.

As evident from the rigged academic work cited above, human research that is informed by critical theory often is not falsifiable. It is pseudoscience, and activist academics indirectly admit this when they reveal their critical “lenses” in their papers. These lenses prevent activist academics from considering alternative interpretations of their data. In the study of white adolescents, the activist academics knew from the start that they would portray the white adolescents negatively. If the adolescents did not make racist remarks, then the activist academics would conclude that the adolescents had exhibited “white ignorance.” If the adolescents did make racist comments, then the activist academics would say that the adolescents showed direct evidence of racism. In other words: Heads, I win; tails, you lose!

Moreover, because such work is not genuine research, there is no reason to conduct it in the first place. Thus, these “studies” disrespectfully waste participants’ time and expose participants to an unnecessarily increased risk of harm.