RETURN TO MESSAGE INDEX PAGE

Sinclair said if Kimmel apologizes to and pays Kirk's family, they might lift the suspension Posted by Pikes Peak 14115 on September 18, 2025, 3:32 pm ADMIN How do you define extortion? Maybe Kirk and his family should apologise to Joe Biden for calling him a tyrant criminal who should be in prison, and who deserved the death penalty. I am uncertain exactly when American White Christian Nationalists discovered Charlies Kirk and his Turning Point USA, but dottir informed me young gamers knew about Kirk for a decade; the Kirk who Snopes verified that statement as accurate and true, along with the many other things Kirk said about people he clearly HATED, is well known to them. Meanwhile RFK jr moved to decertify the organ procurement orgaization, allowing investors opportunity to buy, sell, and trade organs for profit. Remember when Yakov Smirnov used to say, "America! What a country!" To a building, the felon in an operator sitting in a cab, and his cabinet a wrecking ball he controls. He is a fuel loaded jet heading straight for the World Trade Center as a metaphor for America. His intent is to destroy it, and burn it to the ground because it's taller than any of his buildings. His morning make up person is a ceramic artist who lathers clay on the face to hide pockmarks that may be third stage syphilis. His evening person is a sculptor with a chisel who removes the same. You can look away from a painting, but you can't listen away from a symphony

I might do an apology Posted by greenman on September 19, 2025, 9:52 am, in reply to "Sinclair said if Kimmel apologizes to and pays Kirk's family, they might lift the suspension" Valued Poster The rest is a shakedown, and illegal. Whoever suggested this should be arrested and charged with extortion. RESIST!

The first question is exactly what should he apologize for? Posted by Sia on September 19, 2025, 2:16 pm, in reply to "I might do an apology" There was NO injury to Kirk or his memory. The supposed injury was to trump alone! NOTHING he said implied a single negative criticism of Kirk, just of trump's reaction and responses. So it is pure BS. Besides, even if he does that, trump WON'T be satisfied and their merger will be nixed. IMHO, such massive mergers should be illegal! No ONE company should own all of its former competition because a lack of competition kills innovation AND stifles all future competition and unfairly injuries smaller companies. Massive monopolies also create companies that are "too big to fail" and leaves entire markets subject to ghe whims of the current and future admins.

Well it would be a kind of non-apology Posted by greenman on September 19, 2025, 5:49 pm, in reply to "The first question is exactly what should he apologize for? " Valued Poster 'I'm sorry if you were offended.' Obviously he shouldn't buckle under to extortion. RESIST!

Agreed! Posted by Sia on September 19, 2025, 8:44 pm, in reply to "Well it would be a kind of non-apology" ADMIN

Don't do it Jimmy!! Stand your ground!!! Posted by dancing digits on September 19, 2025, 1:20 am, in reply to "Sinclair said if Kimmel apologizes to and pays Kirk's family, they might lift the suspension" Valued Poster Be the change. . .

No! He didn't say anything wrong. Posted by Sia on September 19, 2025, 1:17 am, in reply to "Sinclair said if Kimmel apologizes to and pays Kirk's family, they might lift the suspension" ADMIN

National Review had 2 articles condemning government influence in Kimmels mess. Posted by TW on September 18, 2025, 5:43 pm, in reply to "Sinclair said if Kimmel apologizes to and pays Kirk's family, they might lift the suspension" Valued Poster The Government Shouldn’t Police Jimmy Kimmel’s Lies https://www.nationalreview.com/2025/09/the-government-shouldnt-police-jimmy-kimmels-lies/ Of Course the FCC Is Abusing Its Power over Broadcasting https://www.nationalreview.com/2025/09/of-course-the-fcc-is-abusing-its-power-over-broadcasting/ I and other conservatives are condemning the Trump Administration's activities with utilizing government power and influence to attack free speech. Bondi has as well. ‘Hate Speech,’ ‘Hate Crimes,’ and Mutually Assured Lawfare Destruction https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/hate-speech-hate-crimes-and-mutually-assured-lawfare-destruction/ My point being, National Review is pretty evenhanded and are certainly not a MAGA publication. There are plenty on the site that condemn Trump and his administration when they do wrong.

I've watched Kimmel's monologue twice now. Posted by dancing digits on September 19, 2025, 1:19 am, in reply to "National Review had 2 articles condemning government influence in Kimmels mess." Trump: "He said a 'horrible thing' about a great gentlemen known as Charlie Kirk. . . " https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/kimmel-said-horrible-thing-about-charlie-kirk-trump-says-2025-09-18/ What exactly did Kimmel say about Kirk that was horrible? Jimmy Kimmel on Instagam: "Instead of the angry finger pointing, can we just for one day agree that it is horrible and monstrous to shoot another human being? On behalf of my family, we send love to the Kirks and to all the children, parents and innocents who fall victim to senseless gun violence. https://www.instagram.com/p/DOb8B9xjgZJ/ From Kimmel's monologue: "Thank you for joining us here in Los Angeles, the second-largest city in our bitterly divided nation, where, like the rest of the country, we're still trying to wrap our heads around the senseless murder of the popular podcaster and conservative activist Charlie Kirk yesterday, whose death has amplified our anger, our differences. And I've seen a lot of extraordinarily vile responses to this from both sides of the political spectrum. Some people are cheering this, which is something I won't ever understand. We had another school shooting yesterday in Colorado—the 100th one of the year. And with all these terrible things happening, you would think that our president would at least make an attempt to bring us together, but he didn't." https://www.readtpa.com/p/read-the-jimmy-kimmel-monologue-that Kimmel went after Trump in his monologue, not Kirk. Exactly what did he say that Trump accused Kimmel of saying a horrible thing about Kirk? What did Kimmel say and where is the supporting evidence? Who is lying in this? Jimmy Kimmel: “We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.” https://www.aol.com/articles/full-transcript-jimmy-kimmel-said-121448035.html Trump has without a doubt has been finger pointing at the other side. In the video I posted above, Trump claimed Kimmel was fired due to the lack of talent but: "Andrew Alford, President of Nexstar’s broadcasting division, elaborated on the decision in a statement to PEOPLE, saying, “Mr. Kimmel’s comments about the death of Mr. Kirk are offensive and insensitive. . . ." https://people.com/what-did-jimmy-kimmel-say-about-charlie-kirks-death-on-his-late-night-show-read-the-full-transcript-11812440 Exactly what did Kimmel say about Kirk's death that was offensive and insensitive? Kimmel was criticizing Trump's response to it. Of Kirk's death, Kimmel said it was horrible, monstrous and senseless. The real reason Kimmel was suspended was because Trump got his panties in a knot over the criticism of him (of Trump). Be the change. . .

This whole tempest is another distraction from Epstein files! Posted by Pikes Peak 14115 on September 19, 2025, 12:42 pm, in reply to "I've watched Kimmel's monologue twice now." ADMIN You can look away from a painting, but you can't listen away from a symphony

Re: I've watched Kimmel's monologue twice now. Posted by dancing digits on September 19, 2025, 1:52 am, in reply to "I've watched Kimmel's monologue twice now." From one of the articles you sited, a quote: "While he never explicitly said the words “the shooter was MAGA,” that’s the natural implication of what he said." Oh? That's not how I interpreted it. I understood it to mean that Trump would do anything to look the other way and blame the 'other side' than to look in his own camp and check to see if there was any affiliation between the shooter and MAGA. The only way to know exactly what was in Kimmel's mind (and the writers) was to ask them directly. There have been no reports that they were asked. Instead of doing so, a quick decision was made and they suspended the show. Be the change. . .

Disney isn't the family oriented company Walt founded Posted by Pikes Peak 14115 on September 19, 2025, 12:57 pm, in reply to "Re: I've watched Kimmel's monologue twice now." ADMIN Ever since Eisner, it became a corporate bully. For example they reduced their music staff by 90% when Eisner directed that one person with MIDI could replace an entire orchestra on retainer. They reduced their staff of animators by 90% when Eisner directed that one person could use cad to graphically animate a story that took a crew of inbetween artists, like my dad. The people who replaced Eisner are worse. AI looms to threaten it all, with entirely computer production from story genesis and creation to completion without involvement of a living human being. The Disney profit margin is obscene. For years, Disney owned a Canoga Park porn studio called West Coast Productions. Among their more well known series are Blacks on Blondes, Godzilla is effing Your Wife, Brickzilla is effing your Daughter, and a whole library of cuckold series. Yeah, A real family oriented company. Is it any wonder they defend, like and favor the felon? You can look away from a painting, but you can't listen away from a symphony

Well said Posted by greenman on September 19, 2025, 10:34 am, in reply to "Re: I've watched Kimmel's monologue twice now." Valued Poster It's unacceptable to use this non-hero's death as a lit must test for free speech. Absolutely unConstitutional. RESIST!

All he did was tell the truth... Posted by Skye on September 19, 2025, 3:45 am, in reply to "Re: I've watched Kimmel's monologue twice now." Valued Poster in a humorous way. Jimmy should get a lawyer and sue all of them who threatened, lied and booted him out.

McCarthyism has returned to the US. We now have Trumpism. Posted by dancing digits on September 19, 2025, 9:00 am, in reply to "All he did was tell the truth..." Valued Poster We need neither. Be the change. . .

Terms and term limits for SCOTUS justices Posted by Pikes Peak 14115 on September 19, 2025, 12:40 pm, in reply to "McCarthyism has returned to the US. We now have Trumpism." ADMIN Why should we suffer for a GENERATION of felon favored decisions like presidential immunity? Why should be suffer a GENERATION of Moscow Mitch favors decisions like Citizens United? If the problem with felon appointed justices isn't obvious and clear, what is? Oh! He wasn't a felon at that time? He became one, and he is the SAME MAN. His appointments, not just to SCOTUES but across the judiciary should be invalid. Look at his record. Blanche, and Bove, and there's a new one. The felon is stacking the deck for his own favor and rule of law; his law. You can look away from a painting, but you can't listen away from a symphony

It is pure B.S.! Posted by Sia on September 19, 2025, 2:14 am, in reply to "Re: I've watched Kimmel's monologue twice now." ADMIN trump simply cannot handle criticism and thanks that how it makes him feel is all that matters! He's wrong!

JImmy Kimmel wasn't 'lying' Posted by greenman on September 18, 2025, 7:34 pm, in reply to "National Review had 2 articles condemning government influence in Kimmels mess." Valued Poster ..but I'm glad the Nazionalsozialistische Review realized that. Kudos. RESIST!

Good name for it Posted by Pikes Peak 14115 on September 18, 2025, 10:40 pm, in reply to "JImmy Kimmel wasn't 'lying'" ADMIN Few things are funnier than the Naziosocialistika Review. Perhaps if King Charles gave the felon a ride in a giant orange pumpkin carriage drawn by six mice turned into horses by a vaccine replacement replacement concoction prescribed by RFK jr? You can look away from a painting, but you can't listen away from a symphony

Zero tolerance for these people. Posted by greenman on September 18, 2025, 5:12 pm, in reply to "Sinclair said if Kimmel apologizes to and pays Kirk's family, they might lift the suspension" Valued Poster No offense, no apology. EVER. RESIST!

anything for a buck, but I highly doubt Kimmel will bend the knee Posted by Trish on September 18, 2025, 4:16 pm, in reply to "Sinclair said if Kimmel apologizes to and pays Kirk's family, they might lift the suspension" Admin and if he had a good contract, there may be a lawsuit ahead

I believe he does Posted by Pikes Peak 14115 on September 18, 2025, 10:33 pm, in reply to "anything for a buck, but I highly doubt Kimmel will bend the knee" ADMIN ABC Disney Sinclair made a very bad decision. Additionally I understand many ABC viewers plan to boycott the network over this. I doubt MAGA and Fox viewers will rush in to save or shore up ABC. I watch zero network television. You can look away from a painting, but you can't listen away from a symphony

« Back to index