A Psychopath Talking About Seizing Elections—and a Party Too Cowardly to Stop Him
Posted by Sia on February 3, 2026, 12:13 pm ADMIN
A Psychopath Talking About Seizing Elections—and a Party Too Cowardly to Stop Him “This isn’t a policy disagreement.
It’s authoritarianism, said out loud.”
by Adam Kinzinger - Feb 3
What Donald Trump said on Dan Bongino’s show should chill anyone who still believes American democracy is operating on normal rails.
Trump claimed—without evidence—that immigrants were “brought to our country to vote” and that they “vote illegally.” Then he took the next step. He said Republicans should “take over the voting and nationalize it.”
That is not a policy disagreement. That is not rhetorical excess. That is the language of a deranged psychopath who no longer even pretends to accept the most basic premise of a constitutional republic: that elections belong to the people, not to the man who wants to win them.
Let’s be clear about what he’s saying. Trump is arguing that because he believes—again, without evidence—that votes are illegitimate, the federal government should seize control of elections. Not to protect them. Not to administer them fairly. But to “take over” voting itself.
That is authoritarianism, said out loud.
And what makes this moment especially dangerous is not just Trump’s mental unraveling. It’s the silence. The elected Republicans who hear statements like this and either say nothing, shrug, or pretend it’s normal political talk are actively participating in the erosion of democracy.
They know better. Or at least, they should.
There is no factual basis for Trump’s claim. Non-citizens cannot vote in federal elections. There is no evidence of mass illegal voting by immigrants. These lies have been investigated, litigated, audited, and debunked over and over again. Trump knows this. Republican leaders know this. They are lying anyway.
Why? Because the lie serves a purpose.
If Trump convinces his base that elections are inherently fraudulent unless he wins, then any action he takes to “correct” that supposed fraud can be framed as justified. That includes pressuring election officials, intimidating voters, purging rolls, refusing to certify results, or attempting to federalize or “nationalize” elections in ways that strip states and citizens of control.
We have already seen this movie.
In 2020, Trump tried to bully state officials into “finding” votes. He leaned on the Justice Department. He turned the vice president into a target. When all of that failed, he summoned a mob and aimed it at the Capitol. That wasn’t an accident. It was the last step in a process that began with lies about voting.
What he said on Bongino’s show is the next evolution of that same thinking. It’s more explicit now. Less guarded. More unhinged.
And here’s the part Republicans in office cannot escape: their silence is not neutral.
Every time an elected Republican refuses to condemn this rhetoric, they normalize it. Every time they wave it off as “Trump being Trump,” they lower the bar further. Every time they tell themselves they’ll deal with it later, they move the country closer to a moment where dealing with it becomes much harder.
This isn’t just about Trump’s temperament. It’s about intent.
When someone repeatedly claims elections are rigged, then floats ideas about taking control of voting itself, you should assume they are laying the groundwork for interference. Maybe not the same way as last time. Maybe not as chaotically. But with the same goal: ensuring that if the vote doesn’t go his way in November, the system itself can be blamed, overridden, or seized.
That’s why this matters now, not after the election, not after the damage is done.
Republican members of Congress, governors, and party leaders are making a choice in real time. They can say clearly and publicly that elections belong to the states and the voters, that Trump’s claims are false, and that calls to “take over” voting are unacceptable in a democracy.
Or they can stay quiet, look away, and hope they personally survive the fallout.
History will not be kind to the second group.
Because authoritarian movements don’t succeed only because of the strongman at the center. They succeed because of the enablers—the people who knew it was wrong but decided that speaking up was inconvenient, risky, or bad for their careers.
Trump’s statement wasn’t a slip. It was a window into how he thinks. Elections are obstacles. Votes are negotiable. Power is personal.
That mindset is profoundly dangerous.
The good news—because there is still good news—is that the system has held before. Courts have held. State officials have held. Voters have held. But those guardrails only work if people defend them openly and early, not quietly and late.
Calling this out is not “anti-Republican.” It is pro-democracy. It is not partisan to say that a president or candidate who talks about nationalizing voting is unfit to be trusted with power.
The real question now is simple: how many elected Republicans are willing to say that out loud?
Because if they don’t, they won’t be able to claim surprise when Trump tries something in November. They will have helped pave the road.
Democracy doesn’t usually die in one dramatic moment. It erodes under the weight of lies, cowardice, and silence.
..that he’s NORMALIZING this garbage by continuing to say it, and to up the ante. What he PLANS to do you never really know - often he wanders away from something he’d been ‘serious’ about - but the more the media and public just accept him talking about it, the more dangerous it becomes. RESIST!
Exactly
Posted by Skye on February 5, 2026, 8:57 am, in reply to "The danger here is " Valued Poster
He’s just setting the stage for his next illegal and outrageous move, and no one can be shocked or surprised because it’s all being normalized… thanks in large part to the Supreme Court and other corrupt sycophants and cowards who think they have something to gain or no other choice but to go along with all this insanity.
Great point. It can also cut the other way once it is used against the GOP
Posted by Sia on February 5, 2026, 8:51 am, in reply to "The danger here is " ADMIN
in any election cycle by pointing out how anti-American it is. If the government can take over elections, what happens when the opposition gets elected?
Of course, that would have to play out before the GOP managed to actually take over them. Then we'd be looking at Civil War.
This tit-for-tat stuff - and we’re not the only ones facing it, Britain and other nations have that worry - of changing your whole government structure every time an election swings the other way is extremely destabilizing. All the more so if rebellions occur.
Europe worrries ‘Well, what if the Brits want back in to the Eurozone, then FARAGE becomes PM?’ Same with Donnie. ‘You can’t trust America’ is becoming the message, now. RESIST!
IMHO Re: A Psychopath Talking About Seizing Elections—and a Party Too Cowardly to Stop Him
I believe he is serious about changing things but now he is using rhetoric that seems like he is pursuing legislative means just to stoke the flames of his idea so he can use some obscure legal precedent that ambiguously applies when it doesn't happen soon enough.
Using any authority to reject delegates of state electors to martial law.
He has to reach deep into the extremists to make it happen so it could definitely get worse.A Jack of all trades is master of none, but oftentimes better than a master of one.
... And many thanks for the masters in skill for setting our standard of work to instill.
He would need a crapload of help to manage it and his rapid decline and emotional
insecurities/ instability would blow up carefully constructed plans. Everyone with him knows how quickly his whimsy changes and how vicious he is against even his closest allies once he doesn't need or favor them anymore.
This GOP should have died with Nixon. Ford's biggest mistake was pardoning him. His protege is our problem today. Same problem, exponential times worse.
You can look away from a painting, but you can't listen away from a symphony
on February 3, 2026, 12:13 pm
