with two opposing viewpoints that are morally disparate, one based on moral virtue, one on virtue signaling. IMO many of the virtue signalers are people in the “ they mean well” camp emotionally vulnerable easily manipulated by those who want to destroy freedom and democracy. They think of themselves as inclusive but are members of one of the largest tribes going.

The other viewpoint is moral inso far as it promotes freedom from oppression, inclusivity (which does not include Sharia oppressive law, communism, etc al) os all people, and protects the
right of ownership vs collectivism to its citizens.

Since we live in the City of Man on this earth (vs the City of God)
neither of these systems deliver perfection, but freedom with moral motivation will always provide better lives for many more people. History has already proved that. Those who support the “collectivism” mentality put their faith in a proved failed system.
Ignorance of history equals believing lies in this case.

But the real problem goes deep into the matter of the individual, what they believe, and why they believe it. So many variables: experience, education or lack of it, faith or lack of it.

In such a crazy world, my hope and comfort come from the Word of God, reading it, studying it for years, believing it, and experiencing the truth of it over and over in my lifetime in communion with like believers. I am amazed at those who survive well without it.