Norman Dunn's 'Hebburn and our Neighbours Forum'

Norman Dunn's 'Hebburn and our Neighbours Forum'
[ Norman Dunn's 'Hebburn and our Neighbours Forum' ]

Rules! No Bad language or derogatory remarks Please or we will delete. Anyone sharing our content on Face Book must credit 'Hebburn and our Neighbours'.

Trump and starmer

Posted by Colin Thompson on 20/2/2025, 12:34 pm

If Trump allows putin to claim half or even any of Ukraine then who would be next on putins list. I also am pleased to see starmer coming out on the side of zelenski in the war of words with Trump. We are told many times that America is the most powerful nation - all they need now is a leader with common sense

Re: Trump and starmer

Posted by Joseph on 20/2/2025, 1:06 pm, in reply to "Trump and starmer "

Brainwashed,the only explanation I can think of why people voted for this man ,total megalomaniac, acts like a spoilt child if he can't get his own way, as for cosying up to a mass murderer like Putin the mind boggles.

Re: Trump and starmer

Posted by Joseph on 20/2/2025, 1:08 pm, in reply to "Re: Trump and starmer "

Ps referring to Trump, by the way, not Starmer.

Re: Trump and starmer

Posted by Brian on 20/2/2025, 5:54 pm, in reply to "Re: Trump and starmer "

Trump trying to force Ukraine into signing a minerals deal giving USA access to rare minerals, he's been told there's no chance.

Re: Trump and starmer

Posted by Sheila on 20/2/2025, 5:57 pm, in reply to "Re: Trump and starmer "

Trump found the US have given Ukrainian between 300 hundred and 500 hundred billion., he is not happy to give them anymore. l don’t know what it has cost us, but I don’t want any British soldiers to lose their lives. Having said that, Putin is a disgusting individual.

Re: Trump and starmer

Posted by Brian on 20/2/2025, 6:42 pm, in reply to "Re: Trump and starmer "

Was it aid or a loan? Countries don't expect aid back. Somebody was on about his Palestine plan, they suggested all the hotels would be Trump owned. I wouldn't put it past him.

Re: Trump and starmer

Posted by Liz Dance on 20/2/2025, 7:07 pm, in reply to "Re: Trump and starmer "

According to a USA facts web site site they state that since Feb ‘22 America has allocated US$113.4 billion in emergency funding to support Ukraine. However they state that just because the money has been allocated doesn’t mean it has been spent. Different web sites give different amounts so I think that what Trump thinks has been given is not necessarily the correct amount. Some sites state that Ukraine is expected to repay some of this funding with interest, how your guess is a good as mine.

I to don’t want to see any British soldiers loose their lives in this war, assistance yes but lives no.

With regard to the insistance that Zelensky holds elections, maybe he could say that elections will be held 6 months after the end of the war not before, hopefully by that time Ukrainians who have sort shelter around the world will be back in a Ukraine and ready to take part in the election.

Whatever happens when Trump and Starmer meet I sincerely hope that Starmer puts this country’s interests first and not what Starmer thinks will make him look good on the world stage.

Re: Trump and starmer

Posted by Audrey D. on 20/2/2025, 8:55 pm, in reply to "Re: Trump and starmer "

Please don't get your American/Trump news from Fox News, you will not be getting the true picture, or facts.

Re: Trump and starmer

Posted by Colin Thompson on 20/2/2025, 9:13 pm, in reply to "Re: Trump and starmer "

The information we get from his daily speaches is bad enough

Re: Trump and starmer

Posted by AJG on 20/2/2025, 10:27 pm, in reply to "Re: Trump and starmer "

Absolutely. I wouldn't trust Fox News for any kind of objective coverage of anything.

It isn't a news channel so much as a pro-Trump propaganda channel and has been for a long time. See the link below from 2019.

LINK

Re: Trump and starmer

Posted by Sheila on 21/2/2025, 9:49 am, in reply to "Re: Trump and starmer "

AJG, we have the same problem with the BBC with lack of trust. And we have by law to pay for it.

« Back to index