Even if his music is not your thing, Ed Sheeran is an incredible performer
 Previous Message But I may end up having to see Ed Sheeran because a HS friend of my oldest son is opening for him. She went viral covering one of his songs, and he flew her out to London to record with him and offered her two opening slots on his stadium tour. Previous Message Thinking about Triumph but unsure of their condition to put on a good show. Previous Message
2/11: Opeth @ Riv
3/5: LCD Soundsystem @ Aragon
3/18: Ordbit Culture @ HoB
3/25: Lamb of God @ Aragon
4/30: Lambrini Girls @ Metro
5/13: Triumph @ Rosemont Theatre
7/18: Rush @ United Center
|
|
Message Thread | This response ↓
 2026 concert lineup falling into place - bjl63 December 10, 2025, 15:21:11
- So far just tickets to the Sugar reunion in NYC* - Tortillini December 11, 2025, 15:16:09
- Rush will see how prices drop. All other no* - JeffFrank December 11, 2025, 14:11:27
- Might go to Sublime tomorrow, that would be interesting* - reggiedunlop December 11, 2025, 13:13:14
- I went to see The Urge in STL over Thanksgiving - ISeeDeadHawkeyes December 11, 2025, 12:56:27
- My concert-going as really fallen off - AintHatin December 11, 2025, 12:53:03
- Just bought tickets today for Tyler Childers at Wrigley in July* - OB25 December 10, 2025, 16:42:16
- Goldfinger in January, Die Spitz in March. - ghost_of_clt December 10, 2025, 16:36:45
- I JUST really got into LCD Soundsystem this past year. Hmmm.* - KingTalkyTiki December 10, 2025, 16:04:37
- I’m going to one of the Rush dates… - SurfTheBoneyard December 10, 2025, 16:03:26
- Seeing Rush in Philly and Maiden/Megadeth/Anthrax at Red Bull Arena * - Jersey December 10, 2025, 20:52:49
- Also try not to laugh… - SurfTheBoneyard December 10, 2025, 16:05:34
- Even if his music is not your thing, Ed Sheeran is an incredible performer - Sounder December 10, 2025, 16:42:03
- Always a risk, and they are adding a few other musicians to help out - bjl63 December 10, 2025, 16:05:28
« Back to index | View thread » |
on December 10, 2025, 16:42:03, in reply to "