on October 5, 2026, 11:34:50, in reply to "The follow up question was: “why is tigger’s copyright not expired” so it was a request for a reason"
Previous Message
not questioning the accuracy of the first response. I’m using the “best” model - the perplexity default.
Previous Message
Also, what model were you using?
A lot of models will respond without researching so you get an answer fast, though Perplexity's value is supposed to be that you always get back grounded answers. A follow-up that says the answer seems wrong typically calls a tool that does a more thorough search.
Tigger entered PD at a different time than the other characters, so it's likely that the model was trained on content that mentioned Tigger not being PD yet. Previous Message
yesterday and as it turns out....it's first answer to me was wrong. Specifically, it said that the character Tigger was still under copyright while Winnie was not. I asked it a follow up and it corrected itself.
Not sure why it got it wrong at first and then corrected itself within a couple of minutes but it got it right. Previous MessagePrevious Message
I would start making a (naughty) list of people misrepresenting themselves and spread it far and wide in your industry. Previous Message
We're getting resumes that were clearly generated, including required certifications that the candidate didn't actually possess.
During interviews we've also had candidates clearly using some sort of AI tool to answer questions. When you ask for specific work experiences from their resume, there's a pause and then they just give a high level overview of how the software works as opposed to a specific experience.
Probably an unfortunate reality of conducting interviews remotely.
51
