Can someone explain what in the world this debate is about?

I thought it started on the competitiveness of the DuKane Conference this year.

Then it moved into a comparison of which class is better (25s or 26s).

Then it split into debates over whether we are assessing player athleticism or talent and whether you can include pitchers in the analysis.

This is stupid. And dumb.

Let’s see how the year plays out, and then you can debate which year was better for the conference. I’d suggest the “mark to beat” is at least getting to a Super Sectional (StCE in 2025) or winning one (no one in 2025).

If you want to get into ranking players, there is no better method than looking at which schools and conferences they are going to - not bullcrap rating services, stupid Alister/ODM tests, or any of us daddy scouts.

College coaches make mistakes, but by and large a kid goes to Oklahoma for good reason - “XYZTripleDirectionalStateTech” for the same!