Dave's interest in astronomy was evident when he installed his observatory on top of the mountain behind the main building. One thing that I was not able to do that I should have done while there was be present at night and use that HUGE telescope he had to PROVE that stars are not what they tell us they are. There are many that flash various colours, alongside stable white ones but you need to zoom in on them quite a bit to see that. It COULD be a lens artifact but then why are there not MORE lens artifact spinning-balls-of-light, and only two or three? I have my own photos I took with my own zoom lens.


Basically, the stars are not what they tell us. Dave never did publish results of his star-study. I don't know of any published results from that fantastic observatory behind Ventureville. If the stars are not appearing to our eye, zoomed in, the way they're published online, then that would open the door to questioning more and more until you end up where I'm at... no moon landings, flat earth, and even more surprisingly, huge areas of "greater earth" beyond the antarctica ice wall, along with a type of Disney World beyond the gate.

I have more but I can see by your sarcastic response that you're not even willing to entertain the great evidence for flat earth so I'm wasting keystrokes. This is the thing about cryonicists in general: They've narrowed their focus to such a degree that they've become "idiot-savants" knowing a lot about empirical evidence but nothing of epistemology and reasoning.

The problem of general purpose thinking in cryonics is so severe that I noted earlier in this forum that Alcor members who went to a conference in the past year had to show proof of covid vax.... astonishing since there was no virus, no pandemic and no danger... other than from the vax itself...

I'm already worn out from this thread. You people including you disappoint me. Good thing I have the whole rest of the internet and the world to explore.