If you think that I am wrong, TRY TO FIND a survey of the bulk of the World's climatologists which asks them "Do you believe that Mankind is the principal agent of climate change" and received 97% "yes" votes. There was NEVER any such survey.
It would be nice if you would actually LOOK STUFF UP instead of parroting the crap spewing forth from the Main Stream Media.
https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2017/06/a-look-at-the-97-percent-science-consensus-meme/
https://www.fraserinstitute.org/article/putting-the-con-in-consensus-not-only-is-there-no-97-per-cent-consensus-among-climate-scientists-many-misunderstand-core-issues
Even if such a consensus existed, it would be worthless.
Why consensus of experts means NOTHING
https://www.lockhaven.edu/~dsimanek/neverwrk.htm
NUCLEAR POWER
There is no likelihood man can ever tap the power of the atom. The glib supposition of utilizing atomic energy when our coal has run out is a completely unscientific Utopian dream, a childish bug-a-boo. Nature has introduced a few fool-proof devices into the great majority of elements that constitute the bulk of the world, and they have no energy to give up in the process of disintegration.
- Robert A. Millikan (Nobel Laureate) (1863-1953) [1928 speech to the Chemists' Club (New York)]
...any one who expects a source of power from the transformation of these atoms is talking moonshine...
- Ernest Rutherford (Nobel Laureate) (1871-1937) [1933]
There is not the slightest indication that [nuclear energy] will ever be obtainable. It would mean that the atom would have to be shattered at will.
- Albert Einstein, (Nobel Laureate) 1932. [Fission was discovered in 1938, a mere 6 years later.]
That is the biggest fool thing we have ever done. The bomb will never go off, and I speak as an expert in explosives.
- Admiral William Leahy. [Advice to President Truman, when asked his opinion of the atomic bomb project.]