Don't be.
"The '97% climate consensus' is over. Now it's well above 99 ..."
(Above quote is from the website, "The Conversation" ( https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-conversation/ )
Scientific consensus on climate change (Wikipedia):
There is a strong scientific consensus that the Earth is warming and that this warming is mainly caused by human activities. This consensus is supported by various studies of scientists' opinions and by position statements of scientific organizations, many of which explicitly agree with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) synthesis reports.
Nearly all actively publishing climate scientists say humans are causing climate change. Surveys of the scientific literature are another way to measure scientific consensus. A 2019 review of scientific papers found the consensus on the cause of climate change to be at 100%, and a 2021 study concluded that over 99% of scientific papers agree on the human cause of climate change. The small percentage of papers that disagreed with the consensus either cannot be replicated or contain errors.
Full article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_consensus_on_climate_change#:~:text=A%202019%20review%20of%20scientific,human%20cause%20of%20climate%20change.
The scientific consensus on climate change gets even stronger (Oct. 21, 2021 article)
"Four years later [in 2013], I published research examining scientific consensus from a different angle.
Building on earlier work by Naomi Oreskes and working with colleagues from the Skeptical Science team, we analysed more than 12,000 abstracts from scientific studies about global climate change. We found that among the 4000 studies that stated a position on human-caused global warming, 97.1% agreed with the consensus position.
What surprised me after this paper came out was how surprised everyone was at the result. 'Really? 97%? I didn’t realise it was that high!'
That response took me aback, as [despite DFM's demonstrably false claim that the "whole 'consensus' thing is a HOAX concocted by John Cook who runs the HOAX website cited [ https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/skeptical-science/ ], we [the Cook team] weren’t the first research to find 97% consensus on human-caused global warming. We weren’t even the second (William Anderegg* also found 97% consensus in 2010)."
-- John Cook
Full Article: https://lens.monash.edu/@science/2021/10/21/1383952/the-scientific-consensus-on-climate-change-gets-even-stronger
* Expert credibility in climate change
William R. L. Anderegga, James W. Prallb, Jacob Harold, and Stephen H. Schneidera
Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S3G4; William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, Palo Alto, CA 94025; and Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Contributed by Stephen H. Schneider, April 9, 2010 (sent for review December 22, 2009)
"Here, we use an extensive dataset of 1,372 climate researchers and their publication and citation data to show that (i) 97–98% of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field surveyed here support the tenets of ACC outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and (ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers."
‘Case closed’: 99.9% of scientists agree climate emergency caused by humans (Oct. 19, 2021 article)
The scientific consensus that humans are altering the climate has passed 99.9%, according to research that strengthens the case for global action at the Cop26 summit in Glasgow.
The degree of scientific certainty about the impact of greenhouse gases is now similar to the level of agreement on evolution and plate tectonics, the authors say, based on a survey of nearly 90,000 climate-related studies.
The general public does not yet understand how certain experts are, nor is it reflected in political debate. This is especially true in the US, where fossil fuel companies have funded a disinformation campaign that falsely suggests the science is not yet settled, similar to the campaign by tobacco industries to cast doubt on the link between smoking and cancer.
Full article: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/oct/19/case-closed-999-of-scientists-agree-climate-emergency-caused-by-humans