Saying that I'm unconvinced is my way of saying that I've considered the evidence, thought about it, and concluded that it is insufficient to tilt my opinion in favor of the anthropogenic climate change narrative, which is the current theme of mass media whenever they report on the subject.
There are too many examples of changes to the climate that were NOT caused by humans. The start and end of the African Humid Period is just one example in recent pre-industrial history. Climate change is a phenomenon that has been occurring since the Earth formed from dust 4 billion years ago, before humans, or life, even existed. If it were not for climate change the Earth would not support life at all. It is a natural phenomenon that not only got started without humans, it will also never stop no matter what humans do. Climate change is a term that is as general and uncontrollable by humans as the corresponding solid-state geological processes, like continental drift, earthquakes, and volcanoes.
Climate change is too general a term. It is a fact that it occurs, but it is not a fact that it is driven by human activity. The former however, is being used by fanatics to hurl abuse at anyone who disagrees with current fanatical environmental politics.
Like you did. Your response is invalid, fallacious, and obviously ad hominem.