Precisely.
ADMIN
|
Whether or not the contact deserved to be punished with a sending-off has no bearing on the decision. It's exactly like your example of illegally-obtained evidence. In such cases in football, the decision reverts to what the ref initially called (or didn't call) on the pitch.
|
  |
|
Message Thread | This response ↓
- I just love World Cup soccer (rev'd) - greenman July 4, 2026, 5:49 pm
- Sounds ANNOYING! - Sia July 4, 2026, 5:54 pm
- Trump got the head of FIFA to intervene - greenman July 5, 2026, 5:32 pm
- That's not really how the timeline went down. - Poppet July 8, 2026, 3:36 pm
- We disagree. - greenman July 8, 2026, 4:17 pm
- WOW! So the moronic vulgarian just made it 1,000x worse? - Sia July 8, 2026, 3:47 pm
- Exactly. Blundered in belatedly to make everything far worse. - Poppet July 8, 2026, 4:47 pm
- Yes, he made it worse. - greenman July 8, 2026, 4:18 pm
- We'll, I wouldn't begin to venture a guess about that - Sia July 8, 2026, 4:28 pm
- Possibly...perhaps even probably. - Poppet July 8, 2026, 4:53 pm
- So you're not saying that it should or shouldn't have been a red card, but only that - Sia July 8, 2026, 6:39 pm
- Precisely. - Poppet July 8, 2026, 7:35 pm
- It was a red card - greenman July 8, 2026, 7:10 pm
- I assumed that it was clear cut. Apparently it was not. - Sia July 8, 2026, 6:21 pm
- It was - greenman July 8, 2026, 6:34 pm
- Such feeble excuses - greenman July 8, 2026, 5:13 pm
- Of course he does. If the USA wins now, it will have an asterisk beside it - Sia July 5, 2026, 6:16 pm
« Back to index | View thread » |
on July 8, 2026, 7:35 pm, in reply to "So you're not saying that it should or shouldn't have been a red card, but only that"
- Sia July 9, 2026, 10:27 am