Super-duper slap on the wrist IMHO.
From the attachment: ...Michigan's broader failure to monitor its football program... Huh. For anyone except sainted MEECHIGAANN, that might be called lack of institutional control. LOL. Michigan has a ton of cash, so the $$ penalties, while meaningful, will hit the women's lacrosse team harder than the football team. Show cause for a guy coaching on the West Coast in the NFL; ooh, that'll teach him!! Recruiting communication blackout: first time I've heard of that one.  Previous Message ...those are the ones that caught my eye more than the show cause nonsense... plus just the pure monetary hit.
A 25% reduction in football official visits during the 2025-26 season.
A 14-week prohibition on recruiting communications in the football program during the probation period.
|
|
Message Thread | This response ↓
 Michigan football penalties - illini81887 August 15, 2025, 9:59:50
- A whole lot of meh* - Mrap24 August 15, 2025, 10:18:16
- Recruiting restrictions have been meaningful in past situations... - uofi1998 August 15, 2025, 10:44:28
- Ultimately they have to stop the “we don’t want to punish the current players” cop out. - OB25 August 15, 2025, 14:33:53
- Correct. First, now current players can transfer freely. Second, even before, the current players - ATL August 15, 2025, 14:52:06
- Golly gee, we sent a strongly-worded letter to Jim Harbaugh in Los Angeles, isn't that enough???
 - osklister August 15, 2025, 14:46:22
- nm - osklister August 15, 2025, 14:44:49
- They really took a stand suspending him the first game of 2026. Also, it’s Michigan - Mrap24 August 15, 2025, 14:15:10
- Super-duper slap on the wrist IMHO. - osklister August 15, 2025, 13:59:59
- 20 million is a decent chunk* - assassin August 15, 2025, 11:51:18
- Rogue athletic department* - ATL August 15, 2025, 10:16:12
- (alleged) full list of penalties here - Poldark August 15, 2025, 10:08:07
- I’m shocked. They hammered Michigan pretty good. * - uofi1998 August 15, 2025, 10:01:59
« Back to index | View thread » |
on August 15, 2025, 13:59:59, in reply to "Recruiting restrictions have been meaningful in past situations..."