I'm talking legitimate direct technology links* Archived Message
Posted by longsnapper on January 21, 2024, 12:00:10, in reply to "So in this case Apple is taking something invented in 60s (AR/VR headset) and slickly packaging?*"
Previous Message Previous Message The Rokr E1 was the first iTunes integrated phone as a collaboration between moto/Apple. Apple then took both ideas, packaged them in a slick phone and the rest is history. Previous Message Previous Message Previous Message I mean did you seriously read what you wrote? Let’s take their most successful product, the iPhone. Do you think that the original iPhone was the last generation technology of blackberry? Previous Message VR/AR research and development, technology, etc. The vision pro costs $3500 and is a great way to integrate Apple products and apps. As far as I can tell, it's very cool, but it isn't some revolutionary technology. It's a heavy headset that you can wear to watch Ted lasso or have a projected UI for your MacBook. Once it gets in the hands of non-paid reviewers(any user review now is carefully orchestrated by Apple), we'll see what the actual use is for it. Maybe developers, after some time for it, will be able to maximize the hardware.
|
Message Thread: | This response ↓
- Did any of you order an Apple Vision Pro? - doubledown January 19, 2024, 13:05:02
- No. friend offered me his 25% employee discount but even then that's way too expensive* - ECEIllinois January 20, 2024, 15:18:45
- Everyone at the average deucer board bought two* - timmer January 20, 2024, 15:00:05
- I’m not sure how much of a hit it’s going to be but it looks technically amazing - ATL January 20, 2024, 12:28:42
- Ease of use is not technologically amazing. But that's apple's entire business model. - longsnapper January 20, 2024, 13:13:15
- Meh. Their software is almost always the best and their hardware is either best or damned close* - cpsteine January 21, 2024, 11:42:01
- Plug these three fanboi responses straight into my fucking veins* - longsnapper January 20, 2024, 19:21:26
- If you’re actually interested in the topic for non trolling reasons here’s a short - ATL January 21, 2024, 10:18:42
- Is having an anti-apple opinion trolling now? I'm pretty familiar with both Apple and Meta's - longsnapper January 21, 2024, 11:03:50
- If you are so knowledgeable, why did your original post on the topic sounds so stupid - ATL January 21, 2024, 11:16:02
- It was already developed by Motorola, not BlackBerry.* - longsnapper January 21, 2024, 11:24:39
- What was?* - ATL January 21, 2024, 11:36:12
- Touchscreen was an IBM technology, developed (then abandoned) further by Motorola. Then, - longsnapper January 21, 2024, 11:44:56
- lol * - ATL January 21, 2024, 12:22:48
- “If you had invented Facebook, you would have invented Facebook” - bigbop85 January 21, 2024, 12:18:08
- So in this case Apple is taking something invented in 60s (AR/VR headset) and slickly packaging?* - cpsteine January 21, 2024, 11:52:16
- I'm talking legitimate direct technology links* - longsnapper January 21, 2024, 12:00:10
- Wut* - cpsteine January 21, 2024, 12:45:44
- Dude. I think you need to get something to eat. You’re delirious. * - doubledown January 20, 2024, 15:04:54
- You mean like the iPhone’s capacitive touch screen?* - ATL January 20, 2024, 15:01:56
- right on brand* - suburbanmyth January 20, 2024, 14:46:05
- I’m uninterested. Feels like a misstep by Apple. But they’re rarely wrong. Would have preferred they - cpsteine January 20, 2024, 12:18:24
- I was gonna ask the same question. This thing feels like a Juicero. - tvillini January 19, 2024, 14:56:14
- i demo'd one last year; it's pretty spectacular; not sure i would use it a ton so i held off.... - suburbanmyth January 19, 2024, 13:07:37
|
|