So basically can't be sent down? Unless options are used in another way here * 📂 Archived Message Posted by DanSaint on July 10, 2026, 14:47:16, in reply to "I guess it’s basically equal to the Carroll deal and JJ’s been really good" Previous Message Also I’m pretty sure Heyman meant no options. Opt outs wouldn’t make sense in this context Message Thread: Cardinals thread - DanSaint July 10, 2026, 14:20:06 JJ rocks. Let's go. * - illini July 10, 2026, 14:59:06 That seems like a ton of money* - CanHartlebHireSnider July 10, 2026, 14:42:44 Is it? I've completely lost touch with baseball economics.* - uofi1998 July 10, 2026, 14:49:39 Maybe not in the context of the Griffin and McGonigle contracts - CanHartlebHireSnider July 10, 2026, 14:51:34 But id rather lock up young players than try and spend it in free agency - DanSaint July 10, 2026, 14:46:22 I guess it’s basically equal to the Carroll deal and JJ’s been really good - CanHartlebHireSnider July 10, 2026, 14:45:52 JJ seems pretty low risk too (if healthy). The defense is elite and he’s great bat to ball* - CWR10 July 10, 2026, 16:49:50 So basically can't be sent down? Unless options are used in another way here * - DanSaint July 10, 2026, 14:47:16 He’s saying there’s no club options on the deal* - CanHartlebHireSnider July 10, 2026, 14:48:07 Ahhh. Gotcha. Cool* - DanSaint July 10, 2026, 14:48:59 So they are doing the old model they used to - BradUnderwoodforprez July 10, 2026, 14:39:01 « Index   Searching