Posters of original research, analyses, insights etc retain all rights to their work.
Such research etc cannot be used in any format without the written consent of the author.
Buccleuch emerald brooch/es
Posted by Beth on November 22, 2018, 7:37 pm
In mid May 1960 there were a couple of press reports that the Duchess of Buccleuch had lost a valuable emerald brooch at the pre-wedding ball for Princess Margaret.
One of the papers published a photo of the Duchess wearing the brooch as a centre piece to a diamond choker.
I strongly suspect that the Duchess was photographed wearing the brooch on her dress at the opera in Dresden in 1936. The clue that this was an emerald brooch is that the Duchess was wearing a second pair of emerald earrings which went with the emerald parure,
For the second pair of emerald earrings see the photo below.
From time to time the press would have comments on the priceless Buccleuch emeralds; however, for some time I could not understand why because, although the parure I was familiar with is impressive, it did not seem to warrant the attribution of "priceless", even if the emeralds are particularly fine.
Then I saw a photo of the Duchess of Buccleuch at the Devonshire House Ball in 1897.
In the jewels forming the stomacher, I can make out at least 4 large emeralds,
The question is which one was lost in 1960? Could it be the largest? I think that it was set in the central portion of the diamond belt/tiara and presumably it was detachable and could be worn separately
Or would it have been one of the other large emeralds visible in the 1897 photo, possibly the second largest one? If the 1960 photo does show the one lost, then I suspect it was the second largest emerald from the 1897 photo -- but I admit I am hopeless at gauging sizes.
I was unable to find anything else about the emerald which was lost in 1960. Either it was permanently lost (stolen) or the affair was handled without any further publicity. I suspect that the notion put forward in the second press report I posted above - that the brooch might be clinging to the hem of a gown --was designed to provide a convenient way for it to be returned.
Has anyone ever read anything more about this brooch?
Edit: I have just realised that, in the 1960 press report with the photo, the Duchess is wearing the larger emerald brooch on her dress on the left hand side (as we view the photo), so she could have lost either of the jewels.
Wow Beth, such outstanding jewels. I have heard of the Buccleuch Dukes being the most landed gentry in all of Europe, but there jewel collection is little known. I wish we could have more discussion on such families and there purported jewels. I mean outside of the royal dukes, which ducal family has the most jewels; Is it the Devonshire's, the Wellington's, the Westminster's or the catholic dukes who are responsible for all state shows in the UK such as coronations, funerals etc. Don't let me leave out the Ross, Manchester and Sutherland dukes, or does this poll position pass to some Earldoms?
Regards,
Dave.
Previous Message
In mid May 1960 there were a couple of press reports that the Duchess of Buccleuch had lost a valuable emerald brooch at the pre-wedding ball for Princess Margaret.
One of the papers published a photo of the Duchess wearing the brooch as a centre piece to a diamond choker.
I strongly suspect that the Duchess was photographed wearing the brooch on her dress at the opera in Dresden in 1936. The clue that this was an emerald brooch is that the Duchess was wearing a second pair of emerald earrings which went with the emerald parure,
For the second pair of emerald earrings see the photo below.
From time to time the press would have comments on the priceless Buccleuch emeralds; however, for some time I could not understand why because, although the parure I was familiar with is impressive, it did not seem to warrant the attribution of "priceless", even if the emeralds are particularly fine.
Then I saw a photo of the Duchess of Buccleuch at the Devonshire House Ball in 1897.
In the jewels forming the stomacher, I can make out at least 4 large emeralds,
The question is which one was lost in 1960? Could it be the largest? I think that it was set in the central portion of the diamond belt/tiara and presumably it was detachable and could be worn separately
Or would it have been one of the other large emeralds visible in the 1897 photo, possibly the second largest one? If the 1960 photo does show the one lost, then I suspect it was the second largest emerald from the 1897 photo -- but I admit I am hopeless at gauging sizes.
I was unable to find anything else about the emerald which was lost in 1960. Either it was permanently lost (stolen) or the affair was handled without any further publicity. I suspect that the notion put forward in the second press report I posted above - that the brooch might be clinging to the hem of a gown --was designed to provide a convenient way for it to be returned.
Has anyone ever read anything more about this brooch? Edit: I have just realised that, in the 1960 press report with the photo, the Duchess is wearing the larger emerald brooch on her dress on the left hand side (as we view the photo), so she could have lost either of the jewels.
Re: Buccleuch emerald brooch/es. More photos of emeralds and diamonds
On this occasion the Duchess was again wearing the emeralds but in a different configuration for her stomacher. The emerald necklace is used to outline the top of her bodice, and she is wearing the emerald tiara on a diamond base.
I think her lower necklace is the the one worn by Mollie, Duchess of Buccleuch. That necklace seems to have been worn in a longer and shorter version.
Emerald tiara, and diamond necklace in longer version
Diamond necklace in shorter version and the drop diamond earrings.
A sketch showing the emeralds as worn for the coronation of Edward VII
Over the weekend I will post other photos I have collected of the Buccleuch jewels. They raise a number of questions in my mind.
It is very difficult to say who might have the most imposing or valuable jewel collection. Definitely not the Duke of Norfolk (who organises all the grand ceremonial occasions for the royals), as the Norfolks are "relatively" poor. One of the things which I have become aware of over time is that some of the most valuable jewels and collections were acquired by the newly rich industrialists. There are also a number of "old" gentry families who are very wealthy and have (or used to have) significant jewels. I suspect that it would be impossible to give even a guesstimate of who has the grandest or most valuable collection.
Re: Buccleuch emerald brooch/es. More photos of emeralds and diamonds
Thanks for your thoughts Beth, your pictures and the promise of more are an intrigue and I look forward to them. But just off the top of my head, I do think the dukes of Devonshire's, followed by the Westminster's and then maybe the Marlborough's or Wellington's may have the most valuable jewel collections in the old UK gentry with the Buccleuch's coming in somewhere at the end or maybe between the last two mentioned.
Regards,
Dave.
Previous Message
Some more photos of the emeralds.
Worn at the coronation of Edward VII
On this occasion the Duchess was again wearing the emeralds but in a different configuration for her stomacher. The emerald necklace is used to outline the top of her bodice, and she is wearing the emerald tiara on a diamond base.
I think her lower necklace is the the one worn by Mollie, Duchess of Buccleuch. That necklace seems to have been worn in a longer and shorter version.
Emerald tiara, and diamond necklace in longer version
Diamond necklace in shorter version and the drop diamond earrings.
A sketch showing the emeralds as worn for the coronation of Edward VII
Over the weekend I will post other photos I have collected of the Buccleuch jewels. They raise a number of questions in my mind.
It is very difficult to say who might have the most imposing or valuable jewel collection. Definitely not the Duke of Norfolk (who organises all the grand ceremonial occasions for the royals), as the Norfolks are "relatively" poor. One of the things which I have become aware of over time is that some of the most valuable jewels and collections were acquired by the newly rich industrialists. There are also a number of "old" gentry families who are very wealthy and have (or used to have) significant jewels. I suspect that it would be impossible to give even a guesstimate of who has the grandest or most valuable collection.