That is to say, I think there can be observable phenomena leading to inductive argument supporting belief in the existence of God. However, reversing the logic to construct a deductive argument suggesting that God is required in order to product those phenomena fails in the face of possible alternative explanations. One is left without the ability to fulfil knowledge conditions for a conclusion for or against God's existence.

This is one (but not the only) reason I have come to consider the proposition "God exists" to be unfalsifiable for most generally-accepted definitions of "God."