with dictionaries, commentaries, etc.

It has numerous inconsistencies which blur the story. Plus, it contradicts VAST amounts of physical evidence.

My interpretation of the Genesis origin story is that it is Israelite Mythology. It has been handed down over many generations. It is VERY OLD, likely prior to 1500 BCE.

It is not until the birth of Abraham that the Book of Genesis begins a historical narrative.

Also, there is the issue of miracles, which was disposed of once and for all by David Hume in
An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding:
When anyone tells me, that he saw a dead man restored to life, I immediately consider with myself, whether it be more probable, that this person should either deceive or be deceived, or that the fact, which he relates, should really have happened.... If the falsehood of his testimony would be more miraculous, than the event which he relates; then, and not till then, can he pretend [modern English: claim] to command my belief or opinion.

Outside of miracles, I consider the Hebrew Bible to be fairly accurate in its rendition of historical events.