why embarrass the person? Archived Message Posted by bbonb on February 21, 2025, 12:30:09, in reply to "What would you do - work AI edition" Say something like, “ I couldn’t get y”the code to work for me, so I tweaked it. Just wanted you to know in case you want to go back to the original code.” Message Thread: | This response ↓ What would you do - work AI edition - ISeeDeadHawkeyes February 21, 2025, 12:11:39 I'd blast a hole in his ass.* - Stu February 21, 2025, 13:41:40 G* - Illiniphil February 21, 2025, 13:52:54 I* - DocWalk20 February 21, 2025, 14:01:48 G* - DocWalk20 February 21, 2025, 14:01:59 G* - ibdoc February 21, 2025, 14:04:44 I* - Illiniphil February 21, 2025, 14:25:34 S* - Illiniphil February 21, 2025, 14:47:04 G* - Illiniphil February 22, 2025, 11:06:30 That's your solution to everything.* - Warrin'_Illini February 21, 2025, 13:43:18 if something works why change it? - IlliniSax05 February 21, 2025, 13:51:32 I bet that's your philosophy on underpants* - Sammich February 21, 2025, 13:56:48 LMFCO* - Jackie February 21, 2025, 14:26:19 Blasting a hole in the ass, or not changing them?* - Illiniphil February 21, 2025, 14:26:08 Did you have anything to do with the DAX AI dictation pilot?* - ibdoc February 21, 2025, 13:40:31 Do you have a practice of code reviews? - illinibone February 21, 2025, 12:49:01 We don't, it'd really be hard due to the specialized nature of the work - ISeeDeadHawkeyes February 21, 2025, 12:53:48 We have mandatory peer reviews of the code for all reporting as part of the approval workflow - GrandmotherPearlsJam February 21, 2025, 13:19:52 I'd be in favor of it just to out the AI people.* - ISeeDeadHawkeyes February 21, 2025, 13:25:49 Sounds like you need code review more than ever if everyone thinks it’s unreadable. - doubledown February 21, 2025, 13:00:59 100% agree - illinibone February 21, 2025, 13:12:03 what bonbon said vvv* - bbonb February 21, 2025, 12:33:26 why embarrass the person? - bbonb February 21, 2025, 12:30:09 I didn't know you were a code guy. Nice.* - Warrin'_Illini February 21, 2025, 12:26:07 Code-ish, I guess? - ISeeDeadHawkeyes February 21, 2025, 12:47:45 I should learn to code.* - Warrin'_Illini February 21, 2025, 12:57:12 Unless they work for you, I’d fix it and move on - DT February 21, 2025, 12:16:49 Probably will, this is just a giant pet peeve of mine - ISeeDeadHawkeyes February 21, 2025, 12:25:11 Yes. You have to check the output. Could be a good opportunity to implement a policy/procedure * - torinese February 22, 2025, 9:43:48 AI / LLMs can be amazing tools for use in coding. Got to use it responsibly / appropriately though. - DocWalk20 February 21, 2025, 12:38:43 I'd passive aggressively send a question referencing the code. "Hey I'm trying to fix this code that - doubledown February 21, 2025, 12:16:35 What is there to confront him on? Are you not allowed to use AI? - gvibes February 21, 2025, 12:14:43 Maybe confront is the wrong word - ISeeDeadHawkeyes February 21, 2025, 12:16:28 Fix it and let them know you fixed it for them. They owe you now. * - haighter February 21, 2025, 12:14:11   Searching