I have to be honest, I'm not sure what tripe the wikidiots are saying there, "Well it could be regional or it could be by type." but it sounds like two "editors" had a war of words and no-one would back down. This is just another of thousands of good cases for the notion that Wikipedia is not a trustworthy reference and should always be viewed with the greatest suspicion.
As far as sweet potatoes are concerned, the only good reason for their existence is pigs like them and we get bacon out of the deal. If the consumption of yams was all the stood between me and starvation, I would welcome death as a friend.
Message Thread
« Back to index