Pretty fundamentally disagree on your first point.
That call might well decide the league, but it absolutely cannot be treated differently from any other call any other matchweek. Timing and sequence of the matches shouldn't matter to something like this. I don't know if a shot clock is the right answer or not. But when you make clear and obvious the standard of review, that brings the amount of time into the review process. I don't think the the standard of review is necessarily right. I think it is too deferential. The idea that "well, he had a clear view and chose not to call it, so it can't be clear and obvious and VAR has to defer to something that is obviously wrong" is just stupid I think and defeats the purpose of the tool. But I also recognize that VAR (1) can't take huge chunks of time to reviw calls and (2) VAR can't review everything. Which is why I'm kind of leaning to a place I never, ever thought I'd be, which is just scrap it. It's not that it's not a good idea. It's a great idea but one that is just too difficult to implement remotely well. So the game's maybe probably better off without it in its current iteration.  Previous Message it's a call in the last 90 seconds of a match that could very well decide the league. it should be treated differently, especially since they're adding the review time back in, anyway. do you want a shot clock on the review?
|
|
Message Thread | This response ↓
TROSSARD!! (Kickball)* - VIV May 10, 2026, 12:16:08
- Quite the roller coaster day for Chelsea fans - dk Yesterday, 15:09:31
- Phrasing, people. - SurfTheBoneyard May 13, 2026, 16:34:25
- Well City got three and could have had more… - SurfTheBoneyard May 13, 2026, 15:57:45
- Big time Pep Roulette today* - Sounder May 13, 2026, 14:32:12
- Anyone watch the first episode of the HBO USMNT docuseries last night? - Blazer May 13, 2026, 14:29:30
- McDonald's agrees to become new Chicago Fire stadium naming partner - assassin May 13, 2026, 14:11:23
- Man City v Palace today - SurfTheBoneyard May 13, 2026, 12:39:23
- TROGDOR!! (Burninating)* - Gene Parmesan May 12, 2026, 9:50:52
- OPTA has it 81-19 West Ham after that. - SurfTheBoneyard May 11, 2026, 16:23:12
- That’s a pen* - ATL May 11, 2026, 16:05:04
- MOAR VAR* - VIV May 11, 2026, 16:04:34
- 13!* - ATL May 11, 2026, 15:51:56
- WHOA* - VIV May 11, 2026, 15:59:34
- This is all Aston Villa’s fault. This is when Arsenal said fine we will play that - MC May 11, 2026, 15:17:59
- Ritchie probably should have been booked there * - ATL May 11, 2026, 15:08:49
- Rumor, Alonso is Chelsea is close * - MC May 11, 2026, 13:39:43
- ooo - SurfTheBoneyard May 11, 2026, 7:28:40
- 100% a foul - dk May 10, 2026, 13:11:46
- Beat Burnley. * - Poldark May 10, 2026, 13:04:48
- duplicate * - ATL May 10, 2026, 12:34:00
- This isn't good for the old ticker, I must say.* - SurfTheBoneyard May 10, 2026, 12:33:57
- Clear foul. The most ironic of fouls.* - ATL May 10, 2026, 12:33:53
- Oww, my blood pressure. * - VIV May 10, 2026, 12:33:38
- 100% a foul on raya * - VIV May 10, 2026, 12:28:19
- Have to give that foul * - ISeeDeadHawkeyes May 10, 2026, 12:28:13
 « Back to index | View thread » |