![]()
on May 11, 2026, 15:08:49, in reply to "but my contention is that it was given more time *because* it was so consequential"
Which probably adds to the time, but there's no reason to think they were looking to give the goal. If anything, ignoring the myriad tackling Arsenal was doing to get to the Raya foul would indicate the opposite.
Previous Message
it could have been given as a foul in 30 seconds. two replays in and you see 1. Raya getting his left arm held down. 2. Raya getting his shirt held down from the back as he's trying to jump.
They gave it more time because they wanted to ensure it was right. I don't think they were taking all that time looking for reasons to give it. I think they were taking all that time looking for any reason they shouldn't give it.
Previous Message
That call might well decide the league, but it absolutely cannot be treated differently from any other call any other matchweek. Timing and sequence of the matches shouldn't matter to something like this.
I don't know if a shot clock is the right answer or not. But when you make clear and obvious the standard of review, that brings the amount of time into the review process.
I don't think the the standard of review is necessarily right. I think it is too deferential. The idea that "well, he had a clear view and chose not to call it, so it can't be clear and obvious and VAR has to defer to something that is obviously wrong" is just stupid I think and defeats the purpose of the tool.
But I also recognize that VAR (1) can't take huge chunks of time to reviw calls and (2) VAR can't review everything.
Which is why I'm kind of leaning to a place I never, ever thought I'd be, which is just scrap it. It's not that it's not a good idea. It's a great idea but one that is just too difficult to implement remotely well. So the game's maybe probably better off without it in its current iteration.
Previous Message
it's a call in the last 90 seconds of a match that could very well decide the league.
it should be treated differently, especially since they're adding the review time back in, anyway.
do you want a shot clock on the review?
30